Micah Richards the pundit

Is he still being employed as a club ambassador?

Because he has been and continues to reflect very poorly on the club, not only because of his strange takes about City as of late, but his shear ignorance toward the game (in this case, his lack of understanding of the laws of the game).
He's only there to fill the tick box quota, there can be no other reason.

Not intelligent
Not funny
Not fluent
No tactical insight
Begins every answer with a sighing " Yeaahhhh "

A gormless clown !!
 
Every classroom, every shop floor, every office, every TV studio, etc has a clown.
 
Tbf to his comment today i genuinely think he was told to change his mind half way through speaking by the producer.

I say this as Sturridge did exactly the same. Started out by saying it was a goal and it was correct but then almost stopped and said it should be ruled out.

Sky like the controversy.
I noticed that too. Sturrridge seemed to completely contradict himself mid sentence.
 
Gone native.

Not offside. The law changed some time ago but punduts haven't noticed.
Not a foul. Honestly give a foul for that and no headers from corners and free kicks will be scored in top-flight football without a foul being given on the keeper.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.