supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,657
He's not a pundit in the traditional sense. He doesn't offer any tactical insight, but the standard of football punditry in general is very poor when you compare it to other sports. If you had any real knowledge of the game then you'd be on the sidelines. Standing around a screen and moving things around to show snippets might look good, but even then the majority do not understand what they're talking about.
Micah is a personality, and he brings some fun to proceedings. It gives contrast to what can otherwise be overly serious and dull. Got no problem with him.
He can also bring out that side in others as a result, which makes him a positive influence. He can laugh at himself too. He knows he hasn't had the career of others, he knows he doesn't understand the game as well so he just does what he can do best and that's have a laugh.
Henry is probably the best pundit going. The majority are washed up former players living off their names, like spitty and the rat. Henry knows the game, has a deeper understanding of the finer details which separate the good sides from the great and doesn't let any club allegiances get in the way of talking sense.
Micah is a personality, and he brings some fun to proceedings. It gives contrast to what can otherwise be overly serious and dull. Got no problem with him.
He can also bring out that side in others as a result, which makes him a positive influence. He can laugh at himself too. He knows he hasn't had the career of others, he knows he doesn't understand the game as well so he just does what he can do best and that's have a laugh.
Henry is probably the best pundit going. The majority are washed up former players living off their names, like spitty and the rat. Henry knows the game, has a deeper understanding of the finer details which separate the good sides from the great and doesn't let any club allegiances get in the way of talking sense.