Michael le Vell (Kevin Webster)

[Phil Meup]

I still can't see how the CPS thought the case strong enough to go to court after they dropped it the first time.

Maybe they wanted to send out a warning to other perverts.
Hopefully they will reach the correct verdict.

 

[jimharri]

I still can't see how the CPS thought the case strong enough to go to court after they dropped it the first time.

Maybe they wanted to send out a warning to other perverts.
Hopefully they will reach the correct verdict.

Agreed, whatever that verdict may be.

 

[worsleyweb]

Good riddance, dirty scum page do rapist rag

That is a very ignorant post. You really should not comment until a trial has been completed. Which football team he supports is of no relevance whatsoever.

 

[ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN]

Good riddance, dirty scum page do rapist rag

That is a very ignorant post. You really should not comment until a trial has been completed. Which football team he supports is of no relevance whatsoever.

Agreed, innocent until proved guilty and if he is innocent his name is tarnished regardless.

 

[jimharri]

Good riddance, dirty scum page do rapist rag

That is a very ignorant post. You really should not comment until a trial has been completed. Which football team he supports is of no relevance whatsoever.

Agreed, innocent until proved guilty and if he is innocent his name is tarnished regardless.

Not on here. The common consensus is that he's guilty and that, even if he's acquitted, it'sa only because there's not enough evidence to convict him. Perish the thought that he may actually not have committed those heinous acts with which he's been charged. Agreed about the earlier post though; absolutely ridiculous.

 

[worsleyweb]

That is a very ignorant post. You really should not comment until a trial has been completed. Which football team he supports is of no relevance whatsoever.

Agreed, innocent until proved guilty and if he is innocent his name is tarnished regardless.

Not on here. The common consensus is that he's guilty and that, even if he's acquitted, it'sa only because there's not enough evidence to convict him. Perish the thought that he may actually not have committed those heinous acts with which he's been charged. Agreed about the earlier post though; absolutely ridiculous.

You can't educate some people unfortunately. If he is found not guilty, he should be treated as exactly that. I seriously think it is time that annonimity is granted in such cases. If he is not guilty can you even begin to imagine what he has been through. I don't care if is the biggest rag in the world. No one deserves that.similarly if found guilty he deserves his punishment.

 

[2sheikhs]

As Mackenzie has alluded to, something has come to light that has convinced the CPS to persue this. We aren't, or not as yet at least, been aware of this. The CPS have to have the public interest at heart regarding costly court cases.

 

[bluesmith]

Not read the full thread but there is possibly a fairly obvious reason why the case has got so far that will come out after the trial.

I think he will get off personally as there is no way a jury can be sure of his guilt

 

[Anonymous]

Whether he's raped the girl or not , and whether there's DNA or not , it just comes down to his word against hers , and who's version of events a jury believes.

He appears to have stood firm as the prosecution layed into him , and it would appear that they are no further on ...... and if that's the case it's difficult to see how a jury could 'confidently' convict him.

 

[malg]

He certainly 'looks' the type, so I'm convinced.........hang him!