Michael le Vell (Kevin Webster)

How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?
 
CTID1988 said:
How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?
Click to expand...

You worried about something mate?
 
allan harper said:
CTID1988 said:
How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?
Click to expand...

You worried about something mate?
Click to expand...

Er, no, not at all. Why? Whos said something? Go on, who? You cant prove anything. I wasnt there. She fell, i didnt push her, she fell
 
CTID1988 said:
allan harper said:
CTID1988 said:
How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?
Click to expand...

You worried about something mate?
Click to expand...

Er, no, not at all. Why? Whos said something? Go on, who? You cant prove anything. I wasnt there. She fell, i didnt push her, she fell
Click to expand...

That reminds me. When do I get that spade back? I let you borrow that and that chloroform about this time last year? Bit ungrateful not to return them.
 
CTID1988 said:
allan harper said:
CTID1988 said:
How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?
Click to expand...

You worried about something mate?
Click to expand...

Er, no, not at all. Why? Whos said something? Go on, who? You cant prove anything. I wasnt there. She fell, i didnt push her, she fell
Click to expand...

Ha! You're best off getting rid of the steroids mate, it won't look good in court.
 
CTID1988 said:
allan harper said:
CTID1988 said:
How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?
Click to expand...

You worried about something mate?
Click to expand...

Er, no, not at all. Why? Whos said something? Go on, who? You cant prove anything. I wasnt there. She fell, i didnt push her, she fell
Click to expand...

very convincing, you should get an oscar.
 
CTID1988 said:
How do the courts prove someone to be guilty of something that happened so long ago? Surely all DNA evidence is gone etc. Anybody know?
Click to expand...
When there are multiple unconnected victims, they often rely on similarities in their stories to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It's obviously much more difficult to prove anything with only one victim (as in this case), but there are numerous examples of it having happened before so it can be done. In short, I don't know!
 
Webcam episodes are better than the series.

He tore me a new one during the new year episode and when he goes #topsoff its hilarious...
 
baggy said:
Webcam episodes are better than the series.

He tore me a new one during the new year episode and when he goes #topsoff its hilarious...
Click to expand...

Yeah I've been watching the webcams he's done on youtube for past few months, when the top comes off you know it's going to be special although it'll take a lot to top Careless Whisper from the other night, I nearly pissed myself.
 
Haha, yes. Careless Whisper was a recent highlight.

His previous webcam singing Lisa Stansfield was also brilliant...
 
If he's innocent someone must really really hate him to accuse him of things he ain't done. Things this bad.

As for the review of the case, seems suspicious, in fact I don't remember it happening before.
 
PinkFinal said:
If he's innocent someone must really really hate him to accuse him of things he ain't done. Things this bad.

As for the review of the case, seems suspicious, in fact I don't remember it happening before.
Click to expand...

Maybe the Jimmy Savile thing has persuaded the person in question to push this on. How many people have said "300 or so women, and nobody said anything?" Well perhaps she decided to say something?

Or perhaps she decided to now stand up in court, perhaps originally didn't want to, which makes the CPS case a lot weaker?

Either way, (and in no way defending him) you can understand why some argue for anonymity for the accused until conviction. Whichever way this goes, shit sticks.
 
Kris_Musampa said:
PinkFinal said:
If he's innocent someone must really really hate him to accuse him of things he ain't done. Things this bad.

As for the review of the case, seems suspicious, in fact I don't remember it happening before.
Click to expand...

Maybe the Jimmy Savile thing has persuaded the person in question to push this on. How many people have said "300 or so women, and nobody said anything?" Well perhaps she decided to say something?

Or perhaps she decided to now stand up in court, perhaps originally didn't want to, which makes the CPS case a lot weaker?

Either way, (and in no way defending him) you can understand why some argue for anonymity for the accused until conviction. Whichever way this goes, shit sticks.
Click to expand...

Might be the case that it was always just one persons word against the other and that wasn't good enough for the CPS to think they have a good chance of a conviction. The CPS might now have had a change of heart and be thinking that there are so many charges to consider that it's in the public interest to let the court decide his guilt or innocence. But I could be wrong. If the same evidence was reviewed and there's no more evidence than before, I can't think what else would have changed their mind. I suppose other recent cases have also contributed to this decision and charging standards have been changed in favour of letting the court decide in these cases.
 
Even if he was innocent he'll always be known as a peado by people. the law and media needs looking at for incidents like this.
 
Kevin Webster was at Anfield recently:

Man-Utd-19-times-banner.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top