Mick Mcarthy

[Markie07]

Any one got a link?

Id rather watch this..

<a class="postlink" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_city/9362990.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 362990.stm</a>

Good shout :)

"it doesn't matter" love him already.

 

[SuperKevinHorlock]

The interview was on Sky.

 

[Marvin]

Just watched his interview on the Beeb site, can't see anything wrong with what he said. They were on top in the first half and on balance probably did enough for a point. Does the OP want every manager to lick our arses?

they were on top for the first 25 minutes, but by ht a 1-1 was fair. In the 2nd half we battered them, and should have scored a lot more than 4

McCarthy is just bigging up his own team to protect morale

 

[carlosthejackal]

The game could have been out of our reach in the first half, so i think he could justify his point of view.

 

[Marvin]

The game could have been out of our reach in the first half, so i think he could justify his point of view.

Remind me of the saves Hart made. I don't recall him making many. They blew themselves out after a first 20 mins which they were never going to be able to keep up

 

[lancs blue]

Just watched his interview on the Beeb site, can't see anything wrong with what he said. They were on top in the first half and on balance probably did enough for a point. Does the OP want every manager to lick our arses?

they were on top for the first 25 minutes, but by ht a 1-1 was fair. In the 2nd half we battered them, and should have scored a lot more than 4

McCarthy is just bigging up his own team to protect morale

They gave us nore problems at the back than the rags, chelsea and liverpool combined, I don't see that he needs to big them up.

 

[Chippy_boy]

Just watched his interview on the Beeb site, can't see anything wrong with what he said. They were on top in the first half and on balance probably did enough for a point. Does the OP want every manager to lick our arses?

What on earth are you talking about? Their first goal was a fluke after a ridiculous rebound, they had every single referring decision in their favour, a stupid amount f time added on, and they lost. And in your book that equals "deserves a point"????

Madness.

 

[carlosthejackal]

The game could have been out of our reach in the first half, so i think he could justify his point of view.

Remind me of the saves Hart made. I don't recall him making many. They blew themselves out after a first 20 mins which they were never going to be able to keep up

2 last ditch blocks by defenders spring to mind, with the net gaping, take the blue tinted glasses off.

 

[Lancet Fluke]

Ive no problem with McCarthy. He's working very hard to keep his team in the league. Thought his tactics were very good today, compacted his team into our half and never let us settle into rhythm. In the end our class told but 51% possesion shows that his team gave us a good battle. I hope his team survives because they play some decent football.

I've no idea whether the possession stat is right but I agree with everything else you say.

 

[g.dog marshall.]

first half wolves were the better team,there was even some nob behind me shouting johnson your shite in 119!!! mancinis first proper go at it and were top off the league,as for mick i think hes a decent bloke.once a blue allways a blue....