Middle East Conflict

I don't think anyone is claiming any "equivalence". Each party is nasty in its own way.

No equivalence of course but Israel doesn't need to take hostages when it can just detain people without trial. Attacking villages and killing unarmed civilians is wrong, it's just the scale of it that isn't "equivalent".

Even the Shin Bet recognises the issue.

Responding with equal force is a mug’s game!

Change “Capone” to “Hamas” and you’ll get where I’m coming from! “That’s the Chicago way!”

 
Responding with equal force is a mug’s game!

Change “Capone” to “Hamas” and you’ll get where I’m coming from! “That’s the Chicago way!”


I thought the clip was advocating an eye for an eye, even if against the law.

Elliot Ness didn't deal with Capone by obliterating half of Chicago and killing and maiming thousands of innocents.

This must be the worst illustration of "false quivalence" in the thread.
 
Responding with equal force is a mug’s game!

Change “Capone” to “Hamas” and you’ll get where I’m coming from! “That’s the Chicago way!”


And just as another boss replaced Capone something with a different name would replace Hamas, should they be eliminated. History as told through Hollywood .... deluded.
 
I thought the clip was advocating an eye for an eye, even if against the law.

Elliot Ness didn't deal with Capone by obliterating half of Chicago and killing and maiming thousands of innocents.

This must be the worst illustration of "false quivalence" in the thread.
No, it wasn’t an eye for an eye, it was a hand for a finger, a leg for a foot. It was ASYMMETRY, which is exactly what you’re decrying.
 
Last edited:
And just as another boss replaced Capone something with a different name would replace Hamas, should they be eliminated. History as told through Hollywood .... deluded.
Really? That was your takeaway? Hollywood “history”?

Btw, do you know the name of the Italian mafia boss in Chicago these days?
 
Does your random capitalisation in posts help highlight spelling errors, or is it to look like a tabloid journalist?
Yawn. It was to highlight the crux of the post I made, which was clearly missed, either by not watching the clip or simply not understanding what it said.

Outstanding addition to the discussion, though. Thanks for catching the fact I misspelled a word.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.