Interesting post. Here's some of my thoughts.
Historically there seems to be a general acceptance (from reasonable historians) that both sets of people have a right to the land. Classing one group as the immigrants or, as Suella Braverman would say 'invaders', just does not hold.
I totally agree Israel, a western thinking population, is in the wrong place but where else could they have settled after being murdered in their millions in Russia and 'civilised' Europe? Also remember it was not just the German Nazis who hated the Jews. There were millions of collaborators in conquered France, Netherlands etc who were quite happy to point out Jews who needed to be gassed.
The number of Jews living in muslim/Arab countries is minimal. Surely that tells it's own story?
It's war, and in war the victors usually kill more people than the losers. In war attrocities happen every single day. That's what war is, killing people. But if the Palestinians had the weaponry that the Israelis have then this war would be over now with millions of Jews dead. You may disagree with that statement but it is at the heart of why people (and western governments) sympathise with the Israeli side, it's the lesser evil in a war of evil intent.
Hopefully a satisfactory compromise will be found but a compromise requires reasonable people who can accept not 'winning' and that appears to be beyond many in this conflict.
