Middle East Conflict

Who are the kings in this scenario? If it's Iran and the US, I think it's fair to point out only one is middle eastern.
You can pick whomever is holding the keys the kingdom you see when you look at what’s happening.

And, lest the point go unaddressed, the US isn’t in Europe either, but it has protected you for the last 80 years, so let’s not be too high and mighty on besmirching the political and military reach of the U.S. or Iran.
 
I was quibbling about the hyperbolic statement about Beirut being destroyed.
It now looks like the tweet has gone so maybe I was right.
His personal hyperbolic tweet has .... but the footage he sourced it from remains.
The X post has been deleted.
What does THAT mean?
No idea pal. You appear to have all the answers why not bang out another few paragraphs and enlighten us further?

 
What about the videos? Do you believe your own eyes?
The videos show a large explosion in a localised area of Beirut.
There is no context given. We don’t know if the area had been totally evacuated although by all accounts Israel are providing advance warning of where they are going to strike.
We also don’t know if the size of the explosion is due to a hit on stored Hezbollah weapons.
What we do know is that the whole of Beirut hasn’t been destroyed and the bombing wasn’t indiscriminate which is what the now deleted tweet suggested.
 
Is English your second language, because your comprehensive if it assumes so?

Words clearly DO fail you!
You clearly have an intolerance for being challenged, don't you. Intolerance - now there's a word...
 
Last edited:
IMG_1871.jpeg

Not answers, necessarily, but certainly I have an opinion. Sorry if that offends your sensibilities, or anything over 140 characters is TL;DR for you.

As always, feel free to ignore anything and everything I post, but providing us nothing to chew on other than personal snipes isn’t really what we do here, is it?
 
IMG_1872.jpeg

Too funny!

I gave you two opportunities to correct a bad autocorrect and a misspelling and you (incorrectly) chose “you’re”???

Did I wander into the joke thread?

;-)
 
Last edited:
View attachment 134134

Not answers, necessarily, but certainly I have an opinion. Sorry if that offends your sensibilities, or anything over 140 characters is TL;DR for you.

As always, feel free to ignore anything and everything I post, but providing us nothing to chew on other than personal snipes isn’t really what we do here, is it?
To be fair it pretty much is what goes on on here. Most of the politics threads settle on one view eventually and if you dare to have a different opinion it's like walking into a BLM rally with a kluklux clan hood on.
 
How many more lives were taken by the terrorists on both sides today?

Incidentally, while the IDF terrorists are carpet bombing parts of southern Lebanon, more mosques are being blown up in Gaza; some housing displaced Palestinians. It's almost as if they're cherishing the distraction.
The whole thing is a distraction. If this wasn't going on netanyahu would be facing corruption charges and be out of office.
 
As you state, a completely different thing:
Soldiers vs innocent civilians…it’s right there in the name and even you should be able to see that.
I think you missed the point there. Paramilitary Hamas allegedly use human shields to supposedly protect them from the IDF (who don't care). "Civilian" (armed) settlers use the IDF to support their criminality.
 
Israel is giving people an hour to flee or be atomised in a bombardment. People take family (possibly pets) and cash. Sometime soon those people holding cash will be crossing the channel paying the cash to people smugglers. The wankers who come up with the answer "send them back" ( Nice 3 word slogan that provides no solutions) - where do you send them back to and how? Do we use UK armed personnel to return victims into a war zone?
 
Israel is giving people an hour to flee or be atomised in a bombardment. People take family (possibly pets) and cash. Sometime soon those people holding cash will be crossing the channel paying the cash to people smugglers. The wankers who come up with the answer "send them back" ( Nice 3 word slogan that provides no solutions) - where do you send them back to and how? Do we use UK armed personnel to return victims into a war zone?
Also, some of those people will be angry orphans or otherwise bereaved by a conflict/genocide they see as supported by the collective west - a new generation of arena bombers and 9/11 pilots. Cheers Israel. :-(
 
I’ve stayed out of this thread for some time because I am just too close to the situation to read some of the inhuman rhetoric from a few prominent participants.

I am not sure I will reenter the fray after reading the last 10 pages or so, either.

But I will say that Netanyahu and co are doing exactly as many of us predicted since the heinous 7 October attacks, and that he is is in no way strengthening the current or future security of Israel.

The only thing he is doing is trying to prolong conflict, and give the far-right in his government whatever they want, in order to stay in power and avoid accountability and consequence. And he is willing to kill, maim, raze, destroy, and forcibly annex whatever is necessary to do that. He is absolutely no different to the leaders of Hamas, Hezbollah, or Iran in that regard. He is turning Israel in to a terrorist state, quickly lowering to the level of those abhorrent groups and regimes.

It is saddening to see that there are still so many blind to that reality, or the suffering of so many that have little-to-nothing to do with the 7 October attacks, Hezbollah’s actions, Iran’s program of proxy conflict, or other terrorist undertakings. That includes the majority of Israelis, Palestinians, Lebanese, and Iranians (perhaps especially Iranians given their recent squashed uprising against the Ayatollah government and the outcome of their most recent elections, which say a moderate put in high office for the first time in generations, only for Netanyahu to immediately work to undermine his legitimacy, both in Iran and on the world stage, by provoking a hardline response from the Iranian regime).

How any informed observer can look to Netanyahu as anything more than a corrupt, desperate, spineless, traitorous thug on par with Nasrallah, Haniyeh, or Khamenei is beyond my comprehension.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top