Scouse_Jimi
Well-Known Member
IH8MUFC said:the rags have a better team than chelsea. it will be hard for chelsea to get anything from the swamp.
Really? Player for Player I'd say Chelsea were far better off with the exception of the striker
IH8MUFC said:the rags have a better team than chelsea. it will be hard for chelsea to get anything from the swamp.
Scouse_Jimi said:IH8MUFC said:the rags have a better team than chelsea. it will be hard for chelsea to get anything from the swamp.
Really? Player for Player I'd say Chelsea were far better off with the exception of the striker
glyncity said:the rags i know have been suprisingly quiet about yesterdays game , i suspect that they are keeping their powder dry just in case it goes tits up for them tonight , a rags win tonight and the f***ers will be unbearable , heavy Chelski win please , 0 3 and a shrek og should keep the f***ers quiet
marco said:ermmm sky interview fans of chelsea two london lads then three united fans two irish and a cockney
well im sure you would say your players are better player for player. the rags team of 11 together is better than chelseas. hope jose and his boys prove me wrong though.Scouse_Jimi said:IH8MUFC said:the rags have a better team than chelsea. it will be hard for chelsea to get anything from the swamp.
Really? Player for Player I'd say Chelsea were far better off with the exception of the striker
" seriously " mate dont get too excited , i am notoriously shit at predictionsmarco said:glyncity said:the rags i know have been suprisingly quiet about yesterdays game , i suspect that they are keeping their powder dry just in case it goes tits up for them tonight , a rags win tonight and the f***ers will be unbearable , heavy Chelski win please , 0 3 and a shrek og should keep the f***ers quiet
'seriously' i was rubbing my hands together with excitement as i read your post