Moon Landing

aguero93:20 said:
BlueBearBoots said:
All the 6 manned moon landings:

* Apollo 11 - landed 20 July, 1969
* Apollo 12 - landed 19 November, 1969
* Apollo 14 - landed 5 February, 1971
* Apollo 15 - landed 30 July, 1971
* Apollo 16 - landed 20 April, 1972
* Apollo 17 - landed 11 December, 1972
that's a lot of Cover-ups BBB.



Yep once they had started the lie they had to carry it on! :)
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Skashion said:
Mars is the next frontier for man, but they won't be coming back. It's a one way trip: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.space.com/24112-private-mars-colony-1058-martian-volunteers.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.space.com/24112-private-mars ... teers.html</a>
You have to really asses the mental state of people that want to go live and die on Mars. Just craziness
NASA are screening of course. 200,000 applicants, down to 1,000 potential candidates.
 
Skashion said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Skashion said:
Mars is the next frontier for man, but they won't be coming back. It's a one way trip: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.space.com/24112-private-mars-colony-1058-martian-volunteers.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.space.com/24112-private-mars ... teers.html</a>
You have to really asses the mental state of people that want to go live and die on Mars. Just craziness
NASA are screening of course. 200,000 applicants, down to 1,000 potential candidates.
I just cant believe people would practically condemn themselves to an early death to go to a dusty red planet..
Then again if people didn't do this sort of thing we would be a very isolated world, people dared once to sail off the edge of the earth to see what would happen
 
Skashion said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Skashion said:
Mars is the next frontier for man, but they won't be coming back. It's a one way trip: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.space.com/24112-private-mars-colony-1058-martian-volunteers.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.space.com/24112-private-mars ... teers.html</a>
You have to really asses the mental state of people that want to go live and die on Mars. Just craziness
NASA are screening of course. 200,000 applicants, down to 1,000 potential candidates.

As far as i know NASA have nothing to do with this scam.
 
They should send a rag delegation as the swamp is a dusty, dirty, red planet, devoid of Intelligent life, they wouldn't feel homesick and if the mission failed the loss would be inconsequential.

No brainer for me.
 
pominoz said:
Skashion said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
You have to really asses the mental state of people that want to go live and die on Mars. Just craziness
NASA are screening of course. 200,000 applicants, down to 1,000 potential candidates.

As far as i know NASA have nothing to do with this scam.
Sorry, my mistake, although NASA does have the same stated aim and will likewise not be able to return anyone back to Earth.
 
Skashion said:
pominoz said:
Skashion said:
NASA are screening of course. 200,000 applicants, down to 1,000 potential candidates.

As far as i know NASA have nothing to do with this scam.
Sorry, my mistake, although NASA does have the same stated aim and will likewise not be able to return anyone back to Earth.
Its funny that with all the technological advances we have that Mars will still be a one way trip
 
MCFC-alan88 said:
We have had a lot of technological advances, but our Engines are still severely lacking.

scotty-meme-generator-she-cannae-take-any-more-captain-she-s-gonna-blow-1bc725.gif
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Skashion said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
You have to really asses the mental state of people that want to go live and die on Mars. Just craziness
NASA are screening of course. 200,000 applicants, down to 1,000 potential candidates.
I just cant believe people would practically condemn themselves to an early death to go to a dusty red planet..
Then again if people didn't do this sort of thing we would be a very isolated world, people dared once to sail off the edge of the earth to see what would happen
I'd go tbh.
 
MCFC-alan88 said:
We have had a lot of technological advances, but our Engines are still severely lacking.
I think its more to do with what the human body can take and fuel rather than the delivery systems. We have scramjets that can Mach5 in earths gravity, Human body just cannot take that sort of punishment
 
MCFC-alan88 said:
We have had a lot of technological advances, but our Engines are still severely lacking.
Not for sending things piecemeal and establishing a colony. We lack the ability to bring people back from Mars because we can't send anything heavy enough to generate enough thrust to propel itself off the surface of Mars and back to Earth, but sending things to Mars and leaving it there, we can do that already as we already do. There are other issues to be resolved but sending men to Mars and leaving there, we can do that.

-- Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:45 pm --

BlueBearBoots said:
how long will it take for a manned spaceship to get to mars?
NASA say twenty years. Or do you mean how long, as in how long will the astronauts be travelling?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top