Fame Monster
Well-Known Member
PhuketBlue said:
Perhaps you ought to read and think about the quote you have posted and try and understand the true meaning.
Just to give you a clue, what you have failed to realize is that a university education IS obtained with money, be it the student's money or the taxpayer's and therefore, according to Socrates himself, is worse than no education at all.
And as you have attributed the quote to John Socrates, it's quite clear what kind of education you have in mind (do a Google search on the name and you'll see what I mean).
The inclusion of 'John' was what these people know as Clarkie bait. If i'm able to quote him word for word, don't you think I might be able to take a guess at his name? And as you have obviously looked it up on google, it seems it's got the response I hoped for. Some might say you was my little online woman for taking the bait. Not me, though.
As for the meaning of the quote, it's pretty clear to me. Education should be free and not for profit. As earlier discussed in the thread, students already pay far more than the actual cost of the degree at £3K a year. That money should cover the cost of a tutor, which, when contextualising John's quote, I doubt that tutors were demanding the sort of money back then as they do today. This allows for the universities to make a lot of money with the top boys there on £350K a year.
And for all those moaning about the taxpayer footing the bill, the taxpayer lends the money to the university until the students pay it off a few years later. Of course, some students don't pay back the money, so not all is repaid. Considering this, it strikes me as an oddity that taxpayers would support the rise when more of their money is going to go be borrowed.
I must be honest. I'm beginning to think that some people on this thread don't like students.