Bobbyespania
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 392
Having been going to the Far East for a few years now I can safely say our club is getting more fans each year nowI thought the rags would have had a least 659m visits......
Having been going to the Far East for a few years now I can safely say our club is getting more fans each year nowI thought the rags would have had a least 659m visits......
Having been going to the Far East for a few years now I can safely say our club is getting more fans each year now
i dont bother with mancity.com as its slow and complicated.
the golden rules of a top website is 1) The user interface is easy to use 2) The speed shouldn't make users wait for information or content 3) The appearance is current and modern ... pity that the official site only partially delivers on one of those things.
Think City sacrificed the main site and users just for the sponsorship cash from Wix.
Talking of websites.
I've just had a look at the Daily Fails sports page. After scrolling down, United have 15 articles, some relating to this weekend's figure against Liverpool, and we have *1* about Jesus.
There you have it. You could probably replicate something similar across most of the newspaper and football related websites this weekend, on-going.
They know where the clicks come from and its the scum so it never will end.
Yes. The Rag sheep will keep on clicking blindly, regardless of how s**t and pointless the article's are.
It's safe to say the Daily Fail must have their own dedicated United reporting office/department.
Just shows how much misinformation and assumptions there can be around bluemoon. City's website platform is provided by a company called Sitecore.
The company that delivered the first incarnation of the site site was a company called Aqueduct http://www.aqueduct.co.uk/about.html#section-about-clients
Seems like they still have City in their client roster but seem more keen to promote Sunderland's website.....