Mother of disabled Child told to pay for seasoncard

[mancityvstoke]

Club perfectly right on this.

shut it scrooge ;)

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Club perfectly right on this.

Now, now. Don't be talking sense on here. Have a good old rant, blame Thatcher and spout a load of ill-informed claptrap like everyone else

 

[mancityvstoke]

Club perfectly right on this.

Now, now. Don't be talking sense on here. Have a good old rant, blame Thatcher and spout a load of ill-informed claptrap like everyone else

Scrooge 2

 

[xenon_]

Some of the posts on this thread are absolutly fucking awful and you cunts posting the stuff make me fucking ashamed to be a blue.


Im disabled and under the rules would qualify for a free carer to help me if needed. But i wont buy a SC because most games i couldnt attend because im fucking not well. Im not fucking able too so i pick games and pay full price.

But what i dont begrudge is some young kid getting a disabled SC and his mother looking after him. Those of you that find that wrong are in my opinion cunts of the very highest order and are an embarrasement to our support.

I fucking despair i really do.

Did you just read the article or the posts in this thread?

Oh ignore her, she is probably on.

Haha! Terrible :)

 

[Anonymous]

Some of the posts on this thread are absolutly fucking awful and you ***** posting the stuff make me fucking ashamed to be a blue.


Im disabled and under the rules would qualify for a free carer to help me if needed. But i wont buy a SC because most games i couldnt attend because im fucking not well. Im not fucking able too so i pick games and pay full price.

But what i dont begrudge is some young kid getting a disabled SC and his mother looking after him. Those of you that find that wrong are in my opinion ***** of the very highest order and are an embarrasement to our support.

I fucking despair i really do.

Its not everyone mate, its just that there will be cases where people are taking advantage.

In most situations its genuine and the carers should go free but theres always the odd few trying to get a freebie that ruin it.

 

[akcity]

Some of the posts on this thread are absolutly fucking awful and you ***** posting the stuff make me fucking ashamed to be a blue.


Im disabled and under the rules would qualify for a free carer to help me if needed. But i wont buy a SC because most games i couldnt attend because im fucking not well. Im not fucking able too so i pick games and pay full price.

But what i dont begrudge is some young kid getting a disabled SC and his mother looking after him. Those of you that find that wrong are in my opinion ***** of the very highest order and are an embarrasement to our support.

I fucking despair i really do.

Maybe, just maybe, you might want to calm down a bit.

Have you ignored the fact that his father is a SC holder, why can't he look after his son? No need for the mother to even attend, certainly not for free!

 

[Matty]

Some of the posts on this thread are absolutly fucking awful and you ***** posting the stuff make me fucking ashamed to be a blue.


Im disabled and under the rules would qualify for a free carer to help me if needed. But i wont buy a SC because most games i couldnt attend because im fucking not well. Im not fucking able too so i pick games and pay full price.

But what i dont begrudge is some young kid getting a disabled SC and his mother looking after him. Those of you that find that wrong are in my opinion ***** of the very highest order and are an embarrasement to our support.

I fucking despair i really do.

Its not everyone mate, its just that there will be cases where people are taking advantage.

In most situations its genuine and the carers should go free but theres always the odd few trying to get a freebie that ruin it.

It's somewhat depressing that this thread has now reached 15 pages, with the associated posts that involves, and people are still somehow completely missing the point. This has nothing to do with disability. The rule change is about equality. It is a rule change which now means all under 14 year olds, and their guardians, are treated equally. It just so happens that, in order to treat them all equally, a knock on effect is that carers for disabled children under the age of 14, who used to get a free ticket, now do not. Where the disabled person is over 14 then the situation is assessed on a case by case basis and this rule will not change that. In many of those cases the carer will indeed go for free. The reasoning is clear, and sound, 14 year olds need a guardian, and that guardian needs to pay for their ticket. It doesn't matter what the abilities of the udner 14 year old are, they will ALL need a guardian, and they will ALL be treated identically.

 

[Pelly Greeny]

“He can’t just go to the main stands with his dad. He needs to take more care. I go because he loves it, but if I have to pay as well, that is a real setback.”

.”

Tell his Dad to fucking move then!!!

Jesus some people really do take the piss.

 

[Eccles Blue]

Some of the posts on this thread are absolutly fucking awful and you ***** posting the stuff make me fucking ashamed to be a blue.


Im disabled and under the rules would qualify for a free carer to help me if needed. But i wont buy a SC because most games i couldnt attend because im fucking not well. Im not fucking able too so i pick games and pay full price.

But what i dont begrudge is some young kid getting a disabled SC and his mother looking after him. Those of you that find that wrong are in my opinion ***** of the very highest order and are an embarrasement to our support.

I fucking despair i really do.

Its not everyone mate, its just that there will be cases where people are taking advantage.

In most situations its genuine and the carers should go free but theres always the odd few trying to get a freebie that ruin it.

It's somewhat depressing that this thread has now reached 15 pages, with the associated posts that involves, and people are still somehow completely missing the point. This has nothing to do with disability. The rule change is about equality. It is a rule change which now means all under 14 year olds, and their guardians, are treated equally. It just so happens that, in order to treat them all equally, a knock on effect is that carers for disabled children under the age of 14, who used to get a free ticket, now do not. Where the disabled person is over 14 then the situation is assessed on a case by case basis and this rule will not change that. In many of those cases the carer will indeed go for free. The reasoning is clear, and sound, 14 year olds need a guardian, and that guardian needs to pay for their ticket. It doesn't matter what the abilities of the udner 14 year old are, they will ALL need a guardian, and they will ALL be treated identically.

Matty, that makes sense, that is not allowed on BM is it? ;-)

 

[MCFC-alan88]

It's somewhat depressing that this thread has now reached 15 pages, with the associated posts that involves, and people are still somehow completely missing the point. This has nothing to do with disability. The rule change is about equality. It is a rule change which now means all under 14 year olds, and their guardians, are treated equally. It just so happens that, in order to treat them all equally, a knock on effect is that carers for disabled children under the age of 14, who used to get a free ticket, now do not. Where the disabled person is over 14 then the situation is assessed on a case by case basis and this rule will not change that. In many of those cases the carer will indeed go for free. The reasoning is clear, and sound, 14 year olds need a guardian, and that guardian needs to pay for their ticket. It doesn't matter what the abilities of the udner 14 year old are, they will ALL need a guardian, and they will ALL be treated identically.

but but but the disabled people are being discriminated against! The highly emotional idiots said so..