The Post office must have realised the significant spike in wrong balances after the introduction of Horizon. Why didn’t they put someone in the shops to watch the operation of the system in say 3 of the post offices concerned. No doubt the subpostmasters would have been relieved to cooperate and then the wrong balances could have be identified as NOT the fault of the subpostmasters. The PO were only concerned with covering their own backsides at the expense of totally innocent people. This stinks to high heaven and those responsible, at both the P.O. and Fujitsu need nailing and holding to account. As usual ordinary folk are the patsies of the self interested bastards with their noses in the trough.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Mr Bates vs the Post Office
- Thread starter bluethrunthru
- Start date
Blue Maverick
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 21,711
Ye and they called him out at the start as well.Just watched PMQ's .... did anyone else observe the notable absence of a certain Lib Dem party leader. one Mr Ed Davey MP for Kensington and Surbiton? Hardly as if he had to travel far to get there.
Blue Maverick
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 21,711
Mate that lady Joan was investigated and they even said in the investigation letter there was no proof she did it, yet they still did her and made her sign something saying she did which she didn’t!The Post office must have realised the significant spike in wrong balances after the introduction of Horizon. Why didn’t they put someone in the shops to watch the operation of the system in say 3 of the post offices concerned. No doubt the subpostmasters would have been relieved to cooperate and then the wrong balances could have be identified as NOT the fault of the subpostmasters. The PO were only concerned with covering their own backsides at the expense of totally innocent people. This stinks to high heaven and those responsible, at both the P.O. and Fujitsu need nailing and holding to account. As usual ordinary folk are the patsies of the self interested bastards with their noses in the trough.
ganganvince
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 6,649
Royal mail owned Post office till 2012 a Royal mail senior IT manager on 5 live today claims to have escalated the issues during his time there and it is unthinkable that this would not cross Adam Croziers deskNot Royal Mail
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
NoIsn't the post office part of the Royal Mail?
While this was going on it was officially still part of Royal mail. The scandal ran from 1999 until 2015 and the post office officially split from the Royal mail in 2012.
Royal mail owned Post office till 2012 a Royal mail senior IT manager on 5 live today claims to have escalated the issues during his time there and it is unthinkable that this would not cross Adam Croziers desk
I'd forgotten about that tosser. I wonder where he is now?
remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
It's both, it's goes with the territory and yes, they shouldn't take the hush money, they should sue the arse off them. Set up a GoFundMe page. They'd piss it. These gangsters can be beaten.He was a CEO whilst it was going on so he must have known, either hes a liar or incompetent or both.
Correct and it shows how corrupt they were. It’s beyond belief. The P.O has perverted the course of justice. An individual who did so would be prosecuted and rightly face grave consequences as should the people concerned at the P.O. and Fujitsu. Like everyone else I am fuming with rage that this could happen.Mate that lady Joan was investigated and they even said in the investigation letter there was no proof she did it, yet they still did her and made her sign something saying she did which she didn’t!