carlos92 said:
bluemanc said:
Explain infamous & andy mitten,in general have you actually read the MEN?
"no bias,interpret angle",you read you see,if a lie is told it's a lie,if a jouno lies about what a dead person was in real life it is a lie.
No angle,no bias,no interpretation or claim,just factual.
Yes I have read the MEN, and ok they have given a rag a coloumn to fill , prehaps we should suggest having a Blue Writer as well, there are a few posters on Blue Moon who can do the job. However in my opinion their reporting has been fair to us. Like it or not they had been the most successful club for the best part of 20 years, we can't change that. Our time is coming and in my view, the way we are being percieved in the press will change over time as well.
You have not read the MEN,you have no idea of what those 2 have wrote.
By all means eccept they are allowed to write whatever they want true or untrue because utd have done well the last 20 yrs, that is up to you.
As for the "percieve" bit,this is a specific thread about the MEN not the general media.
The 2 instances i highlighted are enough but mitten seems to have been given as much leeway as he wants to print whatever he wants about us true or untrue, otherwise his last 2 articles would have been proofed and altered.