My opinion about Kolarov

Re: The truth about Kolorov

Worst left back we've had for years.
Not bad at going forward but his positional awareness and pace are shocking.
I'd rather have Bridge than this liability.
 
Re: The truth about Kolorov

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.surrealfootball.com/2011/06/14/kolarov/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.surrealfootball.com/2011/06/14/kolarov/</a>

City fans have a banner which reads: “We dream of playing in the shirt. Today God chose you. Play like we dream”. No player had followed this literally, not until Aleksandar Kolarov.

How would you play if you played for City? Badly, if you’re reading this. But how would play in your dreams? By maximising your chance of personal glory, and kicking the ball as hard as you can. Principally achieved by shooting; shooting on sight, shooting from distance, shooting from angles, shooting from corners, shooting when no-one else would. And when even he can’t see a shot on, crossing with too much power to result in a goal, merely for the simple joy of belting the ball.

And that’s how Kolarov does. There’s a difference between success and glory and Kolarov knows where he stands. The strongest claim on his abilities comes not from the needs of the team but from a desire to capture for himself as many memorable and enjoyable moments as possible.

People will call him a ‘YouTube player’, as if he only looks good on highlights reels. But he’s more than that: he plays for the sole purpose of his compilations.

People will call him a ‘FIFA player’, as if he is only looks good on consoles. But he’s more than that: he plays as if he were in a video game.

He is the spiritual successor to Roberto Carlos, and shares his commitment to the law of averages: shoot as often, and as hard as possible, and you’ll get lucky enough. He scored three goals for City this year, all from outside the box, and wasted enough good positions to create at least twice as many good chances. But I wouldn’t want it any other way.

If you want productivity, go and watch Leighton Baines. But if you want playing for the fun of it, it’s all about Kolarov. Note his one trick. He skips and flicks the ball with his left foot onto his right side. It’s as redundant as Roque Santa Cruz; his right boot is useless, and he either gives the ball away afterwards, or meekly rolls the ball back onto his strong side. It’s pointless, yes, but that’s not the point.

Take the FA Cup final: one minute into the second half, Kolarov was played in, on the left, by the byline. He should have crossed to a team-mate, but he thumped a ludicrous shot wide. The most important decision of Kolarov’s time at City, and he sneered at the percentages and did what he wanted. After the timidity of Wayne Bridge and diffidence of Javi Garrido that sort of selfishness is emboldening.

Of course, I’d like a left-back that could defend. I’d like one who could tackle, head, pass, mark – who didn’t have to get mercifully dragged off after a 12 minute chasing from Matt Phillips. But there are more things in heaven and earth than usefulness: there’s doing what you want, because you can, and because you want to. There’s shooting on sight, on repeat, for the thrill of it. That’s what we dream about.
 
Re: The truth about Kolorov

Was our most dangerous outlet in the first half, made the first goal. Wasn't at fault for either goal so what game people saw last night i don't know.

There are players like Kompany and Lescott who had far worst games.
 
Re: The truth about Kolorov

Prestwich_Blue said:
If football was like American Football and you could bring on a specialist kicker at free kicks then Kolarov would be a valuable member of the squad. Otherwise he's a waste of space. No pace, no physical presence, poor crosser, poor defender, no tactical awareness.

I'd play Bridge before him.
hey!pack it in your being silly again
 
Re: The truth about Kolorov

We have had some terrible left backs in the last 30 years and Kolarov is not one of them. OK he is not the quickest. But he brings a lot more to the table than some think. His cross at QPR was nigh on perfection. How quickly people forget.

Maybe last night was not the game for him as Napoli break at great pace. However he can hardly say to Mancini "Pick Gael tonight boss".

As far as the CL goes, over the course of the 5 games he's been one of our better players, as by and large, the whole team has been below par. And that includes our esteemed captain.
 
Re: The truth about Kolorov

inbetween said:
Was our most dangerous outlet in the first half, made the first goal. Wasn't at fault for either goal so what game people saw last night i don't know.

There are players like Kompany and Lescott who had far worst games.

Wasn't at fault for the first goal???

And what did he do to create ours? it was Dzeko, Silva and Balotelli.

And there's no way Leascott had a worse game, he was covering on the left side of defence for Kolorov most of the night!
 
Re: The truth about Kolorov

As much as I think AK and Zaba had poor games and as much as I'm a fan of Roberto, these two should never have played last night.

They didnt really offer anything going forward but that isn't always expected from them in my view, though you would prob expect more from AK than PabZab.

My major concern is that they have both been exposed defensively in the CL quite often. It was clear from the first game with Napoli that they were very quick on the break and exploited the space on those breaks really well. There was no reason to believe that they were going to do anything different in that game last night.

A poor team selection in those positions particularly and substitutions too late in the game to effectively turn things around I reckon.
 
Re: The truth about Kolorov

The truth about Kolarov is he's not half as bad as some Bluemooners like to paint him.
 
Re: Re: The truth about Kolorov

halpo123 said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
If football was like American Football and you could bring on a specialist kicker at free kicks then Kolarov would be a valuable member of the squad. Otherwise he's a waste of space. No pace, no physical presence, poor crosser, poor defender, no tactical awareness.

I'd play Bridge before him.
hey!pack it in your being silly again
I wasn't being entirely serious about Bridge but the one thing he would give us is those surging runs infield he used to do. They could take teams by surprise and create space or opportunities for others. I always thought he wasn't the worst at stopping crosses coming in either.

Now - where is Sun Jihai when you need him?
 
Re: The truth about Kolorov

redmizzle said:
The truth about Kolarov is he's not half as bad as some Bluemooners like to paint him.


this.

and add to this the fact people seem blinded when it come to see what a poor footballer lescott is , and how suspect kompany this season is being.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.