my tattoo

20sbc07 said:
ProeliA
Another spelling mistake there mate, yours is alot easier to fix though.


Badge-current.jpg


Look at the A at the end of Superbia, Its the same as the A at the end of Proelia
But then if you look at the 3rd letter in Proelia, that looks the same..

Unless they're Os ?

The reason it looks like that is because that isn't the official crest, although it is often mistaken for the official crest, this is a mock up used by third-party companies.

This is the official crest:

mcfc-logo-largejpg-59beeccba9df615f_large.jpg


It still could be mistaken for an 'a' but the difference isn't quite as obvious in my opinion.
 
Ok lads, time we put this to sleep once and for all.

Proelio = battle, war or fight in Latin

Fact.

Proelia is the plural word for this ie battles, wars and fights.

So good news for dyslexic tattooists and their victims all over as it sort of works either way:-)
 
Manchestercitychorlton said:
BlueHubert said:
Sorry to break this to you but I reckon you have a spelling mistake in there.

The City motto is "Superbia in Proelio", you have Superbia en Praelio"

I hope I´m wrong, but I have a sneaking suspicion that I´m not.
It's praelia.
Well that's what it looks like on the badge anyway.

Edit just seen wiki.


Dont worry about it. In latin it means exactly the same written with the "a" or "o"
 
Manchester1894 said:
Umbro view:

<a class="postlink" href="http://blog.umbro.com/post/city-and-its-crest/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://blog.umbro.com/post/city-and-its-crest/</a>

City and its Crest
3596958737_5254d64ebc.jpg


One talking point has remained throughout the City kit launch and it doesn’t seem to be going anywhere anytime soon. The club crest has been the source of much discussion and opinion and so I’ve decided to give you a quick rundown on the badge. Let’s start from the 1970s…
Before the present incarnation, two other crests have been used. The first, which can be dated to 1970, was based on a design seen on official club documents since the mid-1960s. It was simple in design – a round badge using the same shield used nowadays, inside a circle bearing the name of the club. In 1972, the shield was modified and the lower half of it was replaced with the Lancashire red rose.

old_manchester_city_crest-300x200.jpg


The crest we see now was introduced in 1997. The reasons for this seem to vary a little, and it would be good to see if anybody can shed some light on the actual reason? Anyway, back to the badge. It is based on the arms of the city, and consists of the shield in front of a golden eagle. The shield, in detail, features a ship on its upper half representing the Manchester ship canal, and three diagonal stripes in the lower half, for the city’s three rivers. The bottom of the badge holds the motto ‘Superbia in Proelio’ (the ‘correct’ spelling of this seems to be hotly debated) , and if my beginner’s Latin serves me well, it translates to ‘Pride in Battle’.

So far I’ve managed to avoid the most contentious issue concerning the crest and that is those three stars above the shield and eagle. Many have expressed their views on those three little stars and — more to the point — what purpose they serve. I had my suspicions but thought it was best to find the [most] official line on them. It appears they constitute a design element that give a more continental feel to the design of the crest. Interesting.

That’s all I have on the crest. If you can verify what I’ve found, or provide any extra information, get in touch.
the three stars came about when italian company kappa did the kit.
at the time of design, italy had won the world cup 3 times. the three stars showing their wins. same as the italy national shirt at the time. (also by kappa)
doh! :0)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.