My feeling on our transfer activity is two fold...
Firstly every team wants to screw us with ridiculous fees and we can't fall into that hole now or we will never get out so we have had to act very differently and much more hardball than planned.
So you admit our plans have changed somewhat? Hughes stated we would not pay over the odds, he also stated we wanted players as soon as possible. The demands being made must be in excess of what even he contemplated, and the plan to get players in from the off has been shelved. Hughes must not think 18-20m for RSC Cruz or 20m for Bellamy and Parker, or 15m for Lescott (plus their wages) are "ridiculous" amounts. When did Hughes and Cook realize they would have to "act very differently"?
Secondly all the Bellamy type targets are very much second or third choices
Do you think they don't know this? Do you imagine they will want to move knowing that Hughes will discard them in summer once his primary obejctive of saving his and Cooks jobs has been achieved? Do you think they don't realize Hughes might be replaced come summer (hell, he might be replaced in the next few weeks) and they don't fancy what that might lead to.
and will not be signed until our first choices are definitely no goes
We don't even really know who are first choices are though, do we? These can't be first choices who are less than impressed at the prospect of playing for an apprentice won-nowt manager can they?
and we will not panic due to impatient lily livered fans into overpaying for 3rd choices.
Are the players I mentioned above examples of first, second, or third choices? Who is doing the panicing?
Our first choices are proving harder to get for the reason above
No, not at all. Our first choices are not harder to get because of the money involved, we have the money, it's not out of OUR control.
and due to the fact we are not as high up the league as we thought we would be and so are proving to be longer negotiations.
That's an interesting way of putting it: you might have said, "we are lower in the league"...and why are we so low? Why are negotiations taking longer? What does one have to do with the other? Can you be specific. If I understand what you have written, negotiations (for out first choice players) are taking longer (than orginally planned?) because they are asking for more money (than originally thought...and we are also talking to others without closing the door on our first choices?), and our first choices are showing some reiticence because of our lowly league postition, and whilst they determine City's realistic chances of playing in Europe next year.
Perhaps another reason is they don't think some apprentice manager who has won nothing, with only three years experience at Blackburn, is the kind of manager they want to move lock, stock, and barrel for. They might look at our record under Hughes, and imagine a. he's not good enough, and b. he isn't going to be around much longer anyway.
However for some reason our doom monger ,lily livered, deppresive, impatient and rather naiive fans want to try and make it incompetence or Conspiracy. Incompetence would be signing our second choices early for expensive prices to keep BlueMoon happy!
Whey have we signed Bridge only? Because he is the only first choice signing we have managed to get!!!