Mykhaylo Mudryk

The length of the contract doesn’t actually make it any bigger of a gamble.

The risk with any transfer is getting rid, and the only real obstacle for that in todays PL is wages.

His wages are £100k/week - an amount Nottingham Forest are currently paying - means that anyone in the PL can afford them.

So yeah, theoretically you’re committing to paying him £44m in wages, but if it really goes bad and he’s not good enough, as long as someone can afford to pay him the same, the player will choose to leave and play football rather than sit on the bench until he’s 31.
The only issue here is that I assume his next team (assuming he‘s not good enough for Chelsea) will prefer a 5 year contract and 100k over that term is “only” 26M. The player would be taking a paycut in guaranteed dollars if he moves in the first 3.5 years.

Maybe it’s worth it for playing time as you say, but then again maybe not, no idea.
 
With these kinds of investments
Chelsea will win the CL again before City.


Devastated, we needed this kind of players so badly.
 
With these kinds of investments
Chelsea will win the CL again before City.


Devastated, we needed this kind of players so badly.

No way would we get away with the level of spending Chelsea have deployed recently… how much in the last 12 months?
 
Only counts since the take over so around 400m
We’ve had this before but why were they allowed to write off a 1.6b loan when we had to go to CAS to reverse a ban on over inflated sponsorship for a fraction of that money? Could have just stuck a billion quid in and called it a loan. The 3.5b fee for Chelsea is still in a bank account and none of it has been distributed just yet.

This article asks the pertinent questions about Dodgy Chav FC

 
No way would we get away with the level of spending Chelsea have deployed recently… how much in the last 12 months?
Their wage bill will be enormous with 29 senior players now registered plus their under 21’s, must be coming in around 300m per year. Their amortisation as at today will be around 80m per year not taking into account Lukaku who would add another 20m, interest on their 800m loan will be north of 70m so total of around 470m minimum which is more turnover than the last audited accounts. However, their Finance team will know what they’re doing but it only takes a couple of years out of the CL and they could implode. Their ability to make future signings will be impeded by the lengthy contracts they’re giving out, the amortisation could crush them.
 
We’ve had this before but why were they allowed to write off a 1.6b loan when we had to go to CAS to reverse a ban on over inflated sponsorship for a fraction of that money? Could have just stuck a billion quid in and called it a loan. The 3.5b fee for Chelsea is still in a bank account and none of it has been distributed just yet.

This article asks the pertinent questions about Dodgy Chav FC


Certain things don’t account towards ffp what you can’t use those loans for us buying players or players wages! City owner used to put money in when we were not bringing in as much money he wrote it off Abramovich didn’t want to do that so set up a free interest account for it so when he sold the club he got his loan back! That money after club was sold went to the Ukraine
 
Certain things don’t account towards ffp what you can’t use those loans for us buying players or players wages! City owner used to put money in when we were not bringing in as much money he wrote it off Abramovich didn’t want to do that so set up a free interest account for it so when he sold the club he got his loan back! That money after club was sold went to the Ukraine
It’s not gone to the Ukraine, it’s frozen in a UK bank account. Abramovich was putting in 900,000 per week, it doesn’t matter if it was spent on operating expenses, wages or transfers, it was effectively a 45m per season donation that wasn’t earned which FFP was supposed to prevent happening. The only losses allowed were on Stadium development and youth infrastructure, everything else is impacted by FFP.

Our owner converted loans to shares, he didn’t write them off but this was pre FFP (applied to Abramovich as well) plus we had investment from Silverlake and the Chinese CMC group.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.