Napoli post-match thread

Dirty Harry said:
The bold is irrelevant and not what I'm talking about, it was their tone and disappointment, something you wouldn't get when other English clubs play, that's a certainty, if you don't agree then that's fine, your perception was obviously different from mine, but seriously, you don't expect me to download and "reference specific quotes with time-frame" do you ? it really isn't that important .
Click to expand...
Fair enough - we completely disagree.

As for expecting you to download - took me about 5 minutes to download (you could be doing something else during download). Then, if you know approximately where you think bias occurs - maybe a minute or two to find it.

So yes, unless you don't have broadband, I think it's entirely reasonable to expect that you point out where instances of perceived bias occurred - you've spent more time replying to my comments than it would take to substantiate your case.
 
Anybody know the name of the track, with a kind of Stones vibe to it, that they played, at the Etihad last night, prior to kick off?

Bit of an old git these days, and haven’t heard it before
 
ancoats said:
perfection never wins medals/titles in October you sometimes need to dig in and in groups matches just get the job done and the 2nd goal was job done for me we even had aguero on the bench and at no time in the game did we need to turn to him and like i said pep held us back and we just kept the ball and did the job

man management is a key in champions league and now we have the group in our hands and only need a point from 3 games and have a home game vs feyenoord to win the group if need be so we could even play a weaken team with in the 2 games if we get a point at napoli and even losing to them would not be that bad really looking at the table
Click to expand...
Wait 15 mins to make the sub (that was required last night) against the better teams and we would concede a goal.
 
I also listened to the commentary & as per normal those doing it were trying their absolute best to get our opposition to get something out of the game & of course cause us problems. The worst one for this is Glen Twaddle.
 
CityInWashingtonState said:
Fair enough - we completely disagree.

As for expecting you to download - took me about 5 minutes to download (you could be doing something else during download). Then, if you know approximately where you think bias occurs - maybe a minute or two to find it.

So yes, unless you don't have broadband, I think it's entirely reasonable to expect that you point out where instances of perceived bias occurred - you've spent more time replying to my comments than it would take to substantiate your case.
Click to expand...
This isn't a courtroom.
Will you put him on your ignore list now?
 
Machiavelli said:
This isn't a courtroom.
Will you put him on your ignore list now?
Click to expand...
I only put assholes on ignore. Those who, if they said what they typed in person, would deserve a fucking punch in the face. Well, except maybe for Dax - that guy is just crazy, LOL.

Dirty Harry has been courteous in disagreement.

If someone wants to present a counterpoint, I'm perfectly fine with it - hell, I could agree with Dirty Harry if offered the chance to hear his evidence.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.