You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nasri Appeal (merged).
- Thread starter mancity1
- Start date
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
The risk is the extra game ban, but I would say yes on principle. Absolutely disgraceful decision. If we appeal and fail he'll probably be eligible to play on Tuesday while David Gill awaits Ferguson's decision, but would then miss Watford, Arsenal (would he turn up anyway?), and Fulham home. An extra game ban and he'd miss QPR away.
The risk is the extra game ban, but I would say yes on principle. Absolutely disgraceful decision. If we appeal and fail he'll probably be eligible to play on Tuesday while David Gill awaits Ferguson's decision, but would then miss Watford, Arsenal (would he turn up anyway?), and Fulham home. An extra game ban and he'd miss QPR away.
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
On principle yes, in reality, what's the point? They both should have walked or neither should have, but they won't give Bassong a retrospective red and they won't rescind Samir's under the usual bullshit of not wanting to undermine the referee, even if he was a ****.
On principle yes, in reality, what's the point? They both should have walked or neither should have, but they won't give Bassong a retrospective red and they won't rescind Samir's under the usual bullshit of not wanting to undermine the referee, even if he was a ****.
cleavers
Moderator
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Pointless appealing, he's guilty of the offence, no matter how soft, it was stupid.
Pointless appealing, he's guilty of the offence, no matter how soft, it was stupid.
Don Karleone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 21,653
- Team supported
- Vampire Squid FC
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
I say appeal. If we do and lose I'd love to hear what their reason for upholding it would be? Joke of a decision.
I say appeal. If we do and lose I'd love to hear what their reason for upholding it would be? Joke of a decision.
Thenumber1blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 5,904
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
I would say yes,as it was never a sending off in a million fuckin years BUT what's the point.
I would say yes,as it was never a sending off in a million fuckin years BUT what's the point.
Blue Mooner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Jun 2005
- Messages
- 3,133
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
But they will rescind red cards which undermines the ref witness the recent red cards removed for the west ham and Everton players.
They make it up as they go along.
adrianr said:On principle yes, in reality, what's the point? They both should have walked or neither should have, but they won't give Bassong a retrospective red and they won't rescind Samir's under the usual bullshit of not wanting to undermine the referee, even if he was a ****.
But they will rescind red cards which undermines the ref witness the recent red cards removed for the west ham and Everton players.
They make it up as they go along.
the old abbey
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Not a prayer boys.its all about intent.the intent was there even though he did not connect.shit rule but thats the way it is.hes a dick for moving his head forward.he knew the score.although i thought bassong moved his head forward first.watch it.
Not a prayer boys.its all about intent.the intent was there even though he did not connect.shit rule but thats the way it is.hes a dick for moving his head forward.he knew the score.although i thought bassong moved his head forward first.watch it.