You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nasri Appeal (merged).
- Thread starter mancity1
- Start date
andrewmswift
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 6,957
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
yes and when it's upheld or added on beat on the RVP incident non-stop, literally don't want a single moment where we're not highlighting this bullshit for all the world to see
yes and when it's upheld or added on beat on the RVP incident non-stop, literally don't want a single moment where we're not highlighting this bullshit for all the world to see
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
What kind of intention? A certain player from a few days back looked like he wanted to kill the player that kicked a ball to his head.. He only got yellow card..the old abbey said:Not a prayer boys.its all about intent.the intent was there even though he did not connect.shit rule but thats the way it is.hes a dick for moving his head forward.he knew the score.although i thought bassong moved his head forward first.watch it.
D
D
Deleted member 52846
Guest
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Absolutely yes. He did fuck all!<br /><br />-- Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:09 pm --<br /><br />
Absolutely yes. He did fuck all!<br /><br />-- Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:09 pm --<br /><br />
It's not a sending off offence to flick your chin or forehead in the direction of another players face because its not a dangerous act. Nobody in the history of the football has been hurt by a slight bump in the cheek.the old abbey said:Not a prayer boys.its all about intent.the intent was there even though he did not connect.shit rule but thats the way it is.hes a dick for moving his head forward.he knew the score.although i thought bassong moved his head forward first.watch it.
baildon blue
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Are you saying the F.A are bent LoveCity?LoveCity said:The risk is the extra game ban, but I would say yes on principle. Absolutely disgraceful decision. If we appeal and fail he'll probably be eligible to play on Tuesday while David Gill awaits Ferguson's decision, but would then miss Watford, Arsenal (would he turn up anyway?), and Fulham home. An extra game ban and he'd miss QPR away.
MSP
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
As much as red is a joke, no chance appeal would be successful imo. Nasri was aggressive and they'll reject it easily.
As much as red is a joke, no chance appeal would be successful imo. Nasri was aggressive and they'll reject it easily.
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
No mate, they are paragons of virtue who are the embodiment of consistency and fairness.
baildon blue said:Are you saying the F.A are bent LoveCity?LoveCity said:The risk is the extra game ban, but I would say yes on principle. Absolutely disgraceful decision. If we appeal and fail he'll probably be eligible to play on Tuesday while David Gill awaits Ferguson's decision, but would then miss Watford, Arsenal (would he turn up anyway?), and Fulham home. An extra game ban and he'd miss QPR away.
No mate, they are paragons of virtue who are the embodiment of consistency and fairness.
baildon blue
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
I like the sarcasm i agree with you though the F.A are Manchester United mastersLoveCity said:baildon blue said:Are you saying the F.A are bent LoveCity?LoveCity said:The risk is the extra game ban, but I would say yes on principle. Absolutely disgraceful decision. If we appeal and fail he'll probably be eligible to play on Tuesday while David Gill awaits Ferguson's decision, but would then miss Watford, Arsenal (would he turn up anyway?), and Fulham home. An extra game ban and he'd miss QPR away.
No mate, they are paragons of virtue who are the embodiment of consistency and fairness.