The cookie monster said:I dont think he meant it as your saying matesh249 said:Didsbury Dave said:I never wish injury on anyone, but nasris absence is good news as we will continue to build our midfield around our two main attacking assets; silva and yaya. Having Rodwell, Barry and Garcia available allows us to do that.
Come off it. You obviously don't rate him, but to suggest his injury is 'good news' is pretty ridiculous.
And he didn't do too bad playing in each of the last 6 games last season which won us the league, or in making big contributions to wins against Spurs (twice) and Chelsea, did he?
Read it again.
Appreciate the comment mate, but I do get what he means (or think I do!) - that it's good news as we'll build around Silva and Yaya. But that seems to imply that because Nasri isn't available, we'll definitely play with Yaya in the more advanced role, which I'm not sure about - I suspect that RM might still play him as one of the two orthodox midfielders, especially with Sergio coming back (i.e. sticking with the 4-2-2-2-type formation). Which then means our options on the left are probably Milner, Sinclair and perhaps Balotelli - and I think Nasri is, at the moment, a better bet than them. The teams put up above look fine to me, but I just don't see much sign that Mancini will think about using Tevez (or Aguero) wide left. So losing Nasri for a month means we just have fewer options, to my mind, as well as meaning that, for quite a busy period, we're going to rely perhaps a bit too much on Silva and Yaya.