Nathan Ake

Dont understand why you would have ‘add ons’ with a 27 YO full international, let alone one going to a direct competitor. What would you be adding on? Surely not them winning stuff, or number of appearances, or goals scored, so I can’t see why you’d bother?
Helping to 'grease the skids' probably....
 
If City sell Ake and don’t replace him BM transfer forum will not be a good place to be.

We need Cucurella and then anyone that goes from now on needs replacing.
Probably the same people who bang on about how we don't give opportunities to the youth.

Ake is a brilliant fourth choice centre back who filled in well at left back. I'd be disappointed to see him leave but I understand he needs game time and I wouldn't be heartbroken if we went into the season with three first choice centre backs and a right back who can play there. But I don't think we will.
 
Let's get it right ake shown decent form in 4 or 5 games in seasons spent a lot of time out injured. We are are actually gonna make on what we paid for him and more than likely bring in a fitter and better defender.
100% this, it's not as we are losing a class player in his prime, the heartbeat of the team.

Ake cost 40m has been injured far too often, his first season he was poor, last year decent but again went MIA when needed.

He can and will be upgraded , and to get a profit is simply stunning business.
 
Let's get it right ake shown decent form in 4 or 5 games in seasons spent a lot of time out injured. We are are actually gonna make on what we paid for him and more than likely bring in a fitter and better defender.
A very fair assessment, the lad has never been an ounce of trouble and always gave 100% if he moves good luck to him.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.