And? They didn’t so who fucking cares.Things would have been a lot different if Netherlands had a better midfield. It would have gotten a lot worse for both Bellingham and RIce.
And? They didn’t so who fucking cares.Things would have been a lot different if Netherlands had a better midfield. It would have gotten a lot worse for both Bellingham and RIce.
I think Phil shaded it but Manioo was good.Gazzetta Dello Sport gave MOM to Mainoo. Worst rating? Bellingham.
Spot on. Kane wouldn’t have scored that goal as he’d have still been fannying about 10 yards outside the box. We’ve been crying out for Watkins movement after about an hour in every single gameI said at half time on this thread we would do these if we put Watkins on
the game was crying out for some movement up front, which Kane doesn't offer.
We just don't play in a way these days to put things on a plate for Harry Kane. We need mobility to create space or offer a pass into the box.
I leave you to celebrate but again that wasn't the best Netherlands side in the world and Southgate got most of his subs wrong apart from Watkins. A better Dutch midfield would have got that to extra time. A better attack who knows what the outcome.And? They didn’t so who fucking cares.
And?I leave you to celebrate but again that wasn't the best Netherlands side in the world and Southgate got most of his subs wrong apart from Watkins.
First time England have reached a final out of the UK maybe they should ignore it.The coverage ITV news is giving the game, you’d think we’d won the fucking tournament!
Again I'll leave you to celebrate but again that second half wasn't the bestAnd?
Who gives a fuck? England are in the final and played by far and away their best game of the comp. What is there to ignore? Bitter as fuck.Again I'll leave you to celebrate but again that second half wasn't the best
I am being less biased with England. Nothing to do with being bitter. Their best game against a Netherlands side without a decent midfield. If it ended up 4-1 like Euro 96 with a better Dutch midfield then fair enough. It still needed an injury time winner.Who gives a fuck? England are in the final and played by far and away their best game of the comp. What is there to ignore? Bitter as fuck.
That’s the English media for you blowing things up out of all proportion as per usual.The coverage ITV news is giving the game, you’d think we’d won the fucking tournament!
No it didn’t need an injury time winner FFSI am being less biased with England. Nothing to do with being bitter. Their best game against a Netherlands side without a decent midfield. If it ended up 4-1 like Euro 96 then fair enough. It needed an injury time winner.
They did very well mateThings would have been a lot different if Netherlands had a better midfield. It would have gotten a lot worse for both Bellingham and RIce.
Don't bring Mahrez into it!No it didn’t need an injury time winner FFS
Credit to Southgate for the Kane sub but that should have been a lot sooner. Didn't get it correct with Luke Shaw and Phil should of stayed and either RIce or Bellingham should have been hooked.Sometimes you’ve just got to put your hands up and say fair play. Tonight we looked like a proper team and the decision to put Watkins on is something I would never have done. Well done Southgate and the lads. We could actually do this. We might be peaking at the right time