New CL Format Thoughts | After GW2 (pg13) | GW3 (pg33)

[69FACUPfinal]

The more I look at it the more I realise that Villa (pot 4) got a far better draw than us (pot 1).

I said that on draw day. I also think Dips and Arse got better draws than we did. We are never ( or very, very rarely) out of any cup draw pot first so my suspicions were alerted straightaway. There are those who believed the entire draw was rigged.

 

[Cobwebcat]

 

[Cobwebcat]

I said that on draw day. I also think Dips and Arse got better draws than we did. We are never ( or very, very rarely) out of any cup draw pot first so my suspicions were alerted straightaway. There are those who believed the entire draw was rigged.

Can’t agree with that. See my post above.

Celtic got the easiest draw. PSG the hardest. Our draw was relatively good.

I don’t believe any of the CL draws were rigged ever. By the way just about every fanbase thinks it is rigged against them.

Sometimes, being taken to court continually aside, the World isn’t against us.

 

[Gazza]

View attachment 137396

That's fine but it's based on co-efficients? not current form.

 

[Cobwebcat]

That's fine but it's based on co-efficients? not current form.

It’s not UEFA coefficients if that’s what you mean.

It’s neither and both in a way. It’s based on elo ratings which optimise the likelihood of predicting a particular game outcome. To optimise that prediction form does play a part in the algorithm.

More importantly, for this discussion, it isn’t biased in favour or against anyone thinking the whole thing is rigged to prevent the progress of a particular team, in this case our team.

 

[shemnel]

i think the variability around the draw difficulties is pretty low.