SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
Not sure his 14 starts last seasons agrees with that mate.<br /><br />-- Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:24 pm --<br /><br />Stoned Rose said:We also let a very important player and part of our 'system' NDJ go and really didn't replace him. (As a side note I believe this is a big reason why we aren't as solid this year and are conceeding more chances).
WHy would they offer a FIVE (ie very long and not the usual 2 or 3 year contract) only to change their mind 5 inutes later.buzzer1 said:Cobwebcat said:buzzer1 said:In a cash sense not arsed, in a manager sense, arsed. The owners have erm cash, so to write a few Mil off is not gonna break the bank now is it?
No but you have FFP to consider and while it might be possible to afford a change in manager it's 20 million we can't spend elsewhere at least in the short term. So there are implications.
Yes i understand the ffp thing and yes 20mil is a chunk, but imho if it came to it the owners would rather have a top signing as in manager than a top signing on the pitch as the players will follow, if you know what i mean. By the way, i hope and pray that Bobby gets it right and we can all ride off into the sunset happy, i really really do as i do the same with Ballo etc, but i just have a feeling that all is not well, whether it be with Marwood and all will become well after he fuks off or it is with Bobby and his managerial skills i don't know, but again all is not well.
Before anyone starts i know we are 2nd, unbeaten and champions but again, there is something not quite right at our club.
It would make zero sense.