New home shirt (confirmed)

[FogBlueInSanFran]

Do they have an online inquiry page were I can also apply to be a social media influencer? Are you paid outright or just receive discounts? How do they assess your performance? Do they provide branding and interaction guidelines or allow you creative freedom?

Under normal circumstances I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist about the alleged hidden agendas of posters here, whether shills or rags, but Jesus tap-dancing Christ -- this Blue Mooner guy needs to give it a rest. Who the fuck puts 'bluemoon' in quotes when referring to the site?

Everyone's entitled to his or her own opinion but this site is a pretty accurate gauge of the most loyal and longstanding of City fans whether he likes it or not. The majority here have spoken: it's a poor kit, period, end of.

 

[jayfx]

It's just a really poor effort from the biggest sports brand on the planet, I think that's why most a pissed off.

The whole "stadium shirt" and "match shirt" is ridiculous too. £60 for a shirt that's not even the same as the one the players are going to wear? They really are taking the piss.

Unbelievable. So you're basically paying 60 quid for a Nike tee-shirt!

 

[Gabriel]

Nike haven't been bold, they have been lazy, generic template and not even the right shades of blue. They have been bold when clubs have told them they won't accept this shite and have some good designs out there, unfortunately we have been left with the bone idle fuckers shite one as have many.

Wolfsbergs kits this season coming ok the home is the same template, but not arsed about with core club colours or wank sleeves. we could so easily have had similar unique designs rather than 3 generic templates.
In fact if we had them but the left one in maroon middle in sky blue shirt and the right one sky blue shorts/pinstripes we would have had a cracking set of kits, but we are left with 3 shite ones instead

Good comparison.

 

[Cellarite]

Really!? http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/pictur...s-3-2-extra-time-after-the-news-photo-2932120

Could swear that's a red shirt and black shorts? The rags have worn this combination many, many times.

Your attempt at sarcasm is making you look more like a fool than you already do. That picture is of them playing Leeds United away. I'm not sure whether you are on the wind up but I'll explain this to you anyway. Sometimes, when two teams with similar coloured kits play each other, the away team is required to wear an alternative. Leeds United play in all white so the white home shorts of Manchester United could be classed as a clash by the match officials. They would therefore be required to wear an alternative colour of shorts and on many occasions, have decided to wear the black away shorts with their red home shirts.

I'll repeat myself - United have NEVER worn red shirts and black shorts as a home kit.

 

[york away to this!]

just watched the highlights from last night and the kit is just, errr, dull

 

[blue banks]

Watched the game last night and, as many have said on here, shirt didn't look good. It looked very dull with zero contrast - not striking at all. In saying that, the crest did stand out and looked very well.

 

[PALESTINIAN HEARTED MANC]

I HATE IT

 

[dario2739]

Saw this post on twitter last night from photographer and blue, Kevin Cummins...

Says it all really!!!

 

[SkyBlueTX]

It was ghastly. It's amazing that white socks could clash so badly, but with no white anywhere else in the kit that's exactly what it does. My wife: "Why does it not match, was that on purpose?" Could not answer that.

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

yup, got to admit, I didnt like the kit when I saw it on the pitch, it is what it is though, it shouldnt stop us winning things