SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,084
Ok? Don’t follow your logic, not particularly bothered either way.And thus Bimbobob's point still remains.
Ok? Don’t follow your logic, not particularly bothered either way.And thus Bimbobob's point still remains.
Apparently this nutcase terrorist believes his ideal state is China.No idea what your problem is or why you are offended by criticism of right wing terrorists.
People watching this footage are in the same category as those who, at the site of an serious accident, start taking videos instead of helping or just moving on.No way I'd watch any footage of carnage
Wow. We’re moving vastly off topic and I have no interest in watching the video but you’ve said two things there that I thoroughly disagree with:People watching this footage are in the same category as those who, at the site of an serious accident, start taking videos instead of helping or just moving on.
Makes me wish as an atheist that God genuinely existed, because these people deserve to go to hell (or get reborn as caterpillars for all eternity)
Ya, maybe over reacting but something that does bug me.Wow. We’re moving vastly off topic and I have no interest in watching the video but you’ve said two things there that I thoroughly disagree with:
1) There’s no way to conflate the two, someone not helping and just filming an accident is actually doing harm by their lack of help. Someone watching the video of the attack (for whatever reasons they rationalise in their own heads for watching) is not harming anyone, especially the victims.
2) Saying you wish there was a hell so that people that watched the video could go to it is ridiculous. Of all the things that people could do to make you say tried cliche, you choose watching a video.
Apparently this nutcase terrorist believes his ideal state is China.
You know, that right wing utopia.
So, interestingly enough, I actually remember when this change in perspective happened. This was a Cheney/ Bush directive in how this 'Islamic Terror' was being reported. It was driven up to frenzy level just prior to the first Iraq War giving them license to act. They were playing mental warfare with the public and it seeped over here.
The narrative became about the brown people with beards, who were relatively fighting their own battles on their own lands.
Of course, we know NOW that that was about oil, but it wasn't so well known back then.
When a people invade another land, occupy it and kill hundreds of thousands, it's gonna trigger related or sympathetic people set against that invasion.
And the reaction to that sets off a reaction to that reaction ect, ect, ect.
And then you get the 'lone wolf' people who just need a reason.
Ah, he's a lefty.
Silly us.
He is a murderous fucking scumbag like all those who commit terrorist acts are regardless of the cause they pretend to represent.