And my point exactly. We raise the bar lower and lower in our quest to label players or managers world class and legendary. Too many statues and Knighthoods going up / given out “because (insert name) got one so this player / manager must have one too.
Yes Southgate was a “successful” England manager (compared to his predecessors. But that doesn’t mean he will he be remembered as a “legendary”England manager?
So you can't name one?
Anyhow, He will be remembered fondly despite the pathetic stick he had to endure online, he united the nation and led the youngest squad in major tournaments including two finals.
Every England manager in todays social media world doesn't stand a chance, they're all 'clueless' and 'cunts' - only possible way to win over 'some' of English fans is to win a World Cup or Euros, even then it will only be because we played 'the worst Brazil/Argentina/Germany etc' in its history or we just 'got lucky'. It's the ultimate poison challice.
I respected what Southgate did, how he conducted himself to onslaught of abuse, how he kept the unity in the squad, gave youngsters and in form players opportunities and ultimately turned England into a consistently very good side, having the highest win % at major tournaments than any other England manager.
Venables is remembered fondly for one major tournament in which we didn't have to qualify for - we drew with Switzerland in a very drab match, lucky to beat Scotland thanks to them missing a pen to equalise with 10 mins to go, 0-0 with Spain winning only on pens thanks to Seamen all match and then lost to Germany. the only good performance was against Holland.
why was it remembered so well and full of joy ? because there wasn't a tidal wave of negativity, there wasn't social media abusing every youngster, there wasn't forums questioning every tactic, sub, player and calling the manager a **** for any changes he made.