Ditto.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Newcastle United (A) - Post-Match Thread
- Thread starter mccity
- Start date
Ditto.
salford blue 62
Well-Known Member
TaIs the correct answer
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,300
Is the correct answer that any fan of any club gives when a decision goes their way.
East Level 2
Well-Known Member
I'll take it as the incorrect decisions even themselves out.
I know they don't (and the impact of incorrect decisions certainly don't) but that seems to be the media response when things go against us.
However we need referees and VAR to explain why they make potentially game changing decisions. Particularly VAR as they have the opportunity to see incidents from several angles.
I know they don't (and the impact of incorrect decisions certainly don't) but that seems to be the media response when things go against us.
However we need referees and VAR to explain why they make potentially game changing decisions. Particularly VAR as they have the opportunity to see incidents from several angles.
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 10,880
- Team supported
- City
They have no interest in explaining their decisions, they aren’t there for that.I'll take it as the incorrect decisions even themselves out.
I know they don't (and the impact of incorrect decisions certainly don't) but that seems to be the media response when things go against us.
However we need referees and VAR to explain why they make potentially game changing decisions. Particularly VAR as they have the opportunity to see incidents from several angles.
When you realise that a ‘Match Commander’ can change the outcome of a game, against the decision of the VAR, then no further explanation is needed.
East Level 2
Well-Known Member
Is the "match commander" linked to the "strategic plan to put a new name on the PL trophy every few years" as mentioned by Mr Scudamore, former PL chief?They have no interest in explaining their decisions, they aren’t there for that.
When you realise that a ‘Match Commander’ can change the outcome of a game, against the decision of the VAR, then no further explanation is needed.
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 10,880
- Team supported
- City
Not sure about that specifically but he is very much part of a strategy, their strategy.Is the "match commander" linked to the "strategic plan to put a new name on the PL trophy every few years" as mentioned by Mr Scudamore, former PL chief?
Plays By Sense Of Smell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 11,106
Because we've relentlessly turned it to rubble.Get the “league isnt as strong as it used to be” a lot. Only from United fans as they can’t accept that we may just be better than them in their pomp.
Norman kneejerk
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jan 2011
- Messages
- 1,187
I agree and thought the hysteria and outrage was ridiculous. Cancello had turned with the ball and gone. The collision between Ederson and Fraser didn't deny Fraser an opportunity. There was no ball there and no opportunity.I don't need to do that to know it wasn't anything to do with what you said.
It would be nice if they actually had the bottle to say it, but I can only assume Atkinson decided both Ederson and Fraser just kept going the way they were going before Cancelo nicked the ball, and collided. Call it a "coming together" if you like. And VAR failed to disagree.
JGL07
Well-Known Member
If you take the goals away plus City having 72% possession, 18 shots to 5, 7 shots to 1 on target and 6 corners to 3; I suppose it was an even match?North East news last night had an interview with Fraser who claimed they were the better team "if you take the goals away"