Newcastle United Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
jrb said:
1 poster posted City weren’t one of the clubs involved. Apparently that was reported. No links to any articles, though.

I honestly can’t see City being one of those clubs. After what the PL, the 3 Red Shirt clubs, and Spurs have done to City over last 10 years. I‘m inclined to believe City(and Abu Dhabi) are happy for the Saudis to come on-board as we now have a powerful ally, who‘s takeover of Newcastle was delayed and almost stopped by Liverpool, United, Arsenal, and Spurs.

If it‘s true City are siding with the Red Shirts and Spurs once again, especially after admitting they made a mistake in joining the Super League, I will be well and truly pissed off, like many other City fans will be.
Click to expand...
Agreed with what you say. Can I also add that the media are a lying bunch and in order to get reactions of other fans have printed this news of 19 clubs up in arms. Where’s the proof that City have said this where’s the club statement admonishing the PL and Newcastle?. To me it’s the usual media narrative.
 
KS55 said:
I think we are with the others in asking for a meeting. Our discomfort is about the PL not consulting rather than any objection to the takeover per se.
Click to expand...

Why?

Was it our week?

monty.jpg
 
standupifyouhatemanu said:
I know a few Geordies and they were all ok with our takeover, they were happy we broke the “sky sports 4” cartel.
Click to expand...
Same here. I know a couple and they had no issue with our takeover, they actually said they wished it was them. The majority of honest football fans would agree. Arsenal, Dippers, Spuds, Rags, Everton would all welcome either our owners or the new boys at Newcastle.
 
Caf takes on City regarding Newcastle cont:

‘City clamouring for FFP now’ err…

‘All over Twitter crapping themselves’ err… maybe ‘congratulating’

they also seem to have this idea that a cartel doesn’t exist, Sky4, Hateful8, Parry, Gill etc etc beg to differ.
 
KS55 said:
I think we are with the others in asking for a meeting. Our discomfort is about the PL not consulting rather than any objection to the takeover per se.
Click to expand...
Why would the PL consult with other clubs about the confidential business dealings of another club. Why would Newcastle allow that to happen given the negative smear campaign against them all the way through this takeover process including negative personal attacks on Amanda Staveley.
The poisonous gang at LFC, MUFC, Spurs, and Arsenal have been trying to stop this takeover for years. They have used every trick in the book...just like they did against City.
This is the same process we suffered under during the FFP investigation. All our confidential business information and our evidence was leaked by a person at UEFA to LFC and also MUFC. They then briefed their poisonous pals in the media and it was used to undermine and damage our club. That's why we withdrew our co-operation with UEFA. As Khaldoon said: "It was organised and clear."
It would have been a disgrace if the PL had given advance notice to other PL clubs so some of them could ambush the deal. Why should Newcastle share their commercial information with their business rivals and enemies?
 
The perfect fumble said:
I agree, but we're talking years here, regardless of their vast wealth, FFP means that there's only so much they can throw at this project and they're starting much lower down the pecking order than us.

They need a plan and they need to get some adults in the room who know what they're doing.

The likes of Spurs, Arsenal, Everton, Leicester and West Ham should be looking over their shoulder, in the medium term Newcastle poses a threat to them. In the long term they're a threat to Liverpool and the rags, in the even longer term they're a competitor with us.

They'll never be a threat to City.
Click to expand...
"They'll never be a threat to City"

Like The Noisy Neighbors?
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
Why would the PL consult with other clubs about the confidential business dealings of another club. Why would Newcastle allow that to happen given the negative smear campaign against them all the way through this takeover process including negative personal attacks on Amanda Staveley.
The poisonous gang at LFC, MUFC, Spurs, and Arsenal have been trying to stop this takeover for years. They have used every trick in the book...just like they did against City.
This is the same process we suffered under during the FFP investigation. All our confidential business information and our evidence was leaked by a person at UEFA to LFC and also MUFC. They then briefed their poisonous pals in the media and it was used to undermine and damage our club. That's why we withdrew our co-operation with UEFA. As Khaldoon said: "It was organised and clear."
It would have been a disgrace if the PL had given advance notice to other PL clubs so some of them could ambush the deal. Why should Newcastle share their commercial information with their business rivals and enemies?
Click to expand...
I agree completely. I was merely putting forward what I believe is the other clubs position which is wrong imo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.