Mancity1980
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2011
- Messages
- 10,292
That’s because they are suffering from lack of trophyitis.rag and dipper lemmings seem to care about it.
That’s because they are suffering from lack of trophyitis.rag and dipper lemmings seem to care about it.
It's called trophilis (opposite of trophicopia, which is what we have). Like syphilis, but you catch it from diseased football clubs rather than ...... well, you get the picture.That’s because they are suffering from lack of trophyitis.
Ah, yes syphilis, that explains their blindness to the reality of the current football landscape.It's called trophilis (opposite of trophicopia, which is what we have). Like syphilis, but you catch it from diseased football clubs rather than ...... well, you get the picture.
Not at all, where did i state we are state funded ?You've fallen for this state sponsored garbage. Sheikh Mansour pumped money into City but those days are over.
Those Clubs who have a multitude of Fans who’ve never even been to the City never mind the Stadium are the absolute worst for it -says it all.
Top club, a genuine big club for me, passionate support.
Very similar to ourselves pre takeover with less trophies, in my opinion a far bigger club than Liverpool.
I can see them quickly turning back into the irritating, deluded fanbase that we knew for a couple of years post 2008 until they realised that hating us was futile as we’d disappeared over the horizonTheir fans on Twitter think they need a much bigger stadium now.
You didn't. Sorry. I don't like the premise of your argument though. You are accepting that Man Utd and Liverpool are organic football clubs surviving of their football operation whilst City have independent means. Do we? Sheiklh Mansour invested in City for a brief period. We do not know that he will do do again to fend off a rival club.Not at all, where did i state we are state funded ?