And they all still kiss their Mancini posters before they go to bed.
It's very tiresome and I wish people could let go and not let it cloud their judgement. I was one of the people who wanted Mancini at our club before he was even linked; it's a fairly short list of its type but I can put Merlin and Kun on it but they are all gone and they ain't coming back so you have to move on and try to be objective about what comes next.
No one should denigrate Mancini's achievements at City and no one since perhaps Big Mal has represented this club as manager in such an impactful way.
Bobby is a very good manger, as he is showing again with Italy, but City parted company with him for good reason and now have someone who, quite possibly, one day will be widely acknowledged as the sport's GOAT; there is zero chance that Mancini will be afforded that tribute. And quite simply for me, that is why City need to keep Pep as long as possible.
Whoever succeeds Pep will not be as good but he can still be very successful; not least because he may inherit a great and relatively young team schooled in positional play. That means the next manager probably needs to be one of those guys who follows that discipline or something very similar.
That's why Enrique is a possible. I think Nagelsmann is a good bet and, laugh all you like, I still think Brenda might get the job but plenty can change in the intervening period.