Shaelumstash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 8,254
You're right about the navy being part of our kit from the outset - however it only ever appeared as the sock colour (not shirt trim) until 1989 when the collars were navy for the first time – and in total only 10 (including next seasons) kits have had navy trim out of 61. Personally I think the shirts should only ever have white trim, and navy socks would be a great nod to our history.
In regard to NYCFC - their home kit is skyblue and white, no navy... the away kit is navy and orange, and the badge contains navy and orange which is because of the City flag.
I prefer white trim myself mate.
Just winds me up when people say navy isn't a "City colour". It very much is, it's just some fans aren't fond of it so they've started spinning that line and it seems to have stuck.
Weirdly enough I'm watching the NYCFC game as we speak. Their sponsor, adidas logo and name and numbers are all in navy. Same as ours have been for the last 5 years. Same as ours were for most of the late 80s and 90s.
If you're trying to tell me that their navy trim is nothing to do with Manchester City and has only been included because the city of New York's flag has got some navy blue on it, I'm sorry, I'm going to have to completely disagree.