robinhood CITY
Well-Known Member
lolDeepest Blue said:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Niall Quinn
- Thread starter combster
- Start date
St Helens Blue (Exiled)
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,651
This is so right kev.His obvious gripe he still has is there for all to see.To think he was mentionedcitykev28 said:BL2blue said:Quinn's commentary was certainly myopic, so he obviously regards his days at Arsenal more favourably than those at City.
I can only assume the time spent at The Salutation (30 pints of Guinnness per sesh!) have taken their toll on our Niall.
I talked with him on numerous occasions during his time at City and only found him to be a top bloke, though I know he was gutted at the way the club treated him when he was injured and (at the time) didn't want the transfer to Sunderland, so maybe he has an axe to grind.
His axe that needs grinding is with the dead Peter Swales and others who ran the club, nt us fans who followed him and his team mates all over the country and sang his name constantly.
As a possible ceo aswell.Sorry but quinn can go fuck himself.
citykev28 said:BL2blue said:Quinn's commentary was certainly myopic, so he obviously regards his days at Arsenal more favourably than those at City.
I can only assume the time spent at The Salutation (30 pints of Guinnness per sesh!) have taken their toll on our Niall.
I talked with him on numerous occasions during his time at City and only found him to be a top bloke, though I know he was gutted at the way the club treated him when he was injured and (at the time) didn't want the transfer to Sunderland, so maybe he has an axe to grind.
His axe that needs grinding is with the dead Peter Swales and others who ran the club, nt us fans who followed him and his team mates all over the country and sang his name constantly.
Totally agree with you. I think Quinn left under Franny's tenure to be fair, but Blues were always great with him, even after he left so he should give us better commentary than he does.
mcmanus
Well-Known Member
Read the whole thread and no one has mentioned (might have dreamt it) when Podolski caught Zaba in the face with his arm and Quinn said something along the lines of "get up son, you get plenty of those throughout your career".
As if Zaba is some soft sod. We've patched him up and sent the Bloodied Warrior back on too many times. Pablo 'hard as nails' Zabaleta.
As if Zaba is some soft sod. We've patched him up and sent the Bloodied Warrior back on too many times. Pablo 'hard as nails' Zabaleta.
Berkovic_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 1,266
He really is a very poor pundit/co-commentator. And considering his history with the club he clearly holds no soft spot for us.
Brendan110_0
Well-Known Member
Quinn can suck my chuddies, if I ever see him I'll tell him!
Wexford Blue
Well-Known Member
An easy paycheck from Sky can influence your commentary.. just look at Neville.. who ever thought he could sound unbiased? Don't take it personally.
DD
Well-Known Member
It's threads like this that make you realise what a bunch of embarrassing individuals we have following us.
Niall Quinn didn't seem to have any anti-City agenda to me at all. I actually think that he's a nice chap, thoroughly decent and genuinely has a fondness for City. I also think that he is a pretty average co-commentator who misses the point far too often. That's the problem. He's just not very good.
No conspiracy, no agenda. The same with referees that give bad decisions against us too often. It's not an anti-City thing, it's an incompetence thing.
In either case, it doesn't alter what he did for us as a player. History will not be revised because of a stupid opinion over a red card.
Niall Quinn didn't seem to have any anti-City agenda to me at all. I actually think that he's a nice chap, thoroughly decent and genuinely has a fondness for City. I also think that he is a pretty average co-commentator who misses the point far too often. That's the problem. He's just not very good.
No conspiracy, no agenda. The same with referees that give bad decisions against us too often. It's not an anti-City thing, it's an incompetence thing.
In either case, it doesn't alter what he did for us as a player. History will not be revised because of a stupid opinion over a red card.
Bobbies Black Bins
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 952
Stupendous...
nobody can eat fifty eggs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 4,677
You're the embarrassment you pretentious pillock.DD said:It's threads like this that make you realise what a bunch of embarrassing individuals we have following us.
Niall Quinn didn't seem to have any anti-City agenda to me at all. I actually think that he's a nice chap, thoroughly decent and genuinely has a fondness for City. I also think that he is a pretty average co-commentator who misses the point far too often. That's the problem. He's just not very good.
No conspiracy, no agenda. The same with referees that give bad decisions against us too often. It's not an anti-City thing, it's an incompetence thing.
In either case, it doesn't alter what he did for us as a player. History will not be revised because of a stupid opinion over a red card.