bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
The more times he wins the thinner the skin gets
My point remainsIt was talking to the BBC that (rightly) cost her her job rather than closing his account, she wasn’t part of the decision making process for that.
The more times he wins the thinner the skin gets
My point remains
She was a dick and the person responsible was a dick
Yes of courseYour point she made a silly misguided decision is absolutely right, I was just saying that decision was speaking to the bbc about it rather than closing the account.
I think it was right that she went but the frog eyed twat making this such a personal noisy crusade really doesn’t help. She could have resigned and the governance of banks changed without the hullabaloo and the live rolling news and him banging the drum for the whole board to resign. And I bet he doesn’t stop there.If you want 24/7 live breaking news about a rich man struggling to get a bank account, Sky News have a page.
No I mean the banks which have now become worth protecting from the very balanced bluemoon posters who just happen to see the frog faced racist being in the wrong.You mean by upsetting the establishment? I and many others do not want to hear a thing from that Frog-faced racist.
I find that stories snowball through the media(including social media) because people/posters comment on them. Otherwise it wouldn't get very far.I think it was right that she went but the frog eyed twat making this such a personal noisy crusade really doesn’t help. She could have resigned and the governance of banks changed without the hullabaloo and the live rolling news and him banging the drum for the whole board to resign. And I bet he doesn’t stop there.
The state (we taxpayers) hold a c40% stake in the lender and the share price has dived and will probably dive some more.
Frog eyes won’t care as he gets more oxygen and another few months of exposure.
Ukip got a massive share of votes in fairness