The blue phantom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 10,148
I cannot believe he said they weren't covered up.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nigel Farage
- Thread starter Mike D
- Start date
Of course they were. There’s whole mountains of proof behind them too. North Wales children’s homes, Islington children’s homes, the CoE.
White perpetrators, covered up by the authorities at the time.
Disappointedly disingenuous.
Let’s just take the North Wales Children’s Homes Scandal. The review found policing failures, it didn’t find institutionalised coverups on a scale anywhere near the modern grooming gang scandal level. It was also taking place 55-35 years ago, why would it be sensationalised today when it’s old news?
Even if, and they’re not, your examples were on the levels of authoritative cover up the size of the GGS that involved policing, it still doesn’t make a jot of difference to my actual point here, which is that reverse racism has happened by the police and authorities.
Why don’t you be honest and answer this direct question, do you think it has?
I suggest you read my last reply to him.I cannot believe he said they weren't covered up.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
WTF has this to do with Farage?Disappointedly disingenuous.
Let’s just take the North Wales Children’s Homes Scandal. The review found policing failures, it didn’t find institutionalised coverups on a scale anywhere near the modern grooming gang scandal level. It was also taking place 55-35 years ago, why would it be sensationalised today when it’s old news?
Even if, and they’re not, your examples were on the levels of authoritative cover up the size of the GGS that involved policing, it still doesn’t make a jot of difference to my actual point here, which is that reverse racism has happened by the police and authorities.
Why don’t you be honest and answer this direct question, do you think it has?
City Hobgoblin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2014
- Messages
- 5,959
Not from that wanker HarborneWhere do Labour the tories and the greens get their funding from?
Please can you just fuck off. You are talking complete bollocks and it has nothing to do with Farage.Disappointedly disingenuous.
Let’s just take the North Wales Children’s Homes Scandal. The review found policing failures, it didn’t find institutionalised coverups on a scale anywhere near the modern grooming gang scandal level. It was also taking place 55-35 years ago, why would it be sensationalised today when it’s old news?
Even if, and they’re not, your examples were on the levels of authoritative cover up the size of the GGS that involved policing, it still doesn’t make a jot of difference to my actual point here, which is that reverse racism has happened by the police and authorities.
Why don’t you be honest and answer this direct question, do you think it has?
Why have you asked me that when several other posters who I’m in conversation with me are discussing the same topic?WTF has this to do with Farage?
Is it because you agree with them?
No I won’t. I’m entitled to share my views, there’s lots of people agreeing with you that aren’t posting about Farage too. Why don’t you tell them to fuck off?Please can you just fuck off. You are talking complete bollocks and it has nothing to do with Farage.
You’re that insecure you can’t stand someone not agreeing with you. Your blue sky and Twitter algorithms endlessly showing you stuff you like haven’t helped you.
Looking online I can only find two instances of serving police officers committing murder in the UK, so I don't understand how Farage's comments on the Couzens case are relevant to whether two-tier policing exists. One concerns an individual crime; the other is a claim about policing as a system.Let’s compare the response of this grifting, racist, misogynist piece of shit, not to a black American man murdered by a policeman in America but to a white British woman abducted, raped and murdered by UK policeman Wayne Couzens.
It was an horrific event and Couzens was sentenced to whole life in prison and will, hopefully, never get out,
After Couzens was convicted, the grifter issued yet another ‘address’ and said the following:
“We must not allow the tragic murder of a young woman turn into attacks on men and attacks on the police”
Not only that, he actively defended the police whilst urging the British public to stay calm and not to let this bad apples action poison the well of the police.
Compare and contrast his latest public utterances about 2 tier policing and then actually said
“The rest of us responded with pure, cold rage”
The desired riots and attacks on the police dutifully followed.
What could have motivated the grifter to have changed his approach from one senseless murder to another?
It can only be either the perpetrator of one was white and the other wasn’t or that one victim was a woman and one was a man. Sadly, it’s likely both of those things are true.
Still, nobody is asking him about £5 million anymore…
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Well if we’re talking about noncing and those people who have enabled nonces then Farage is on record a few months back as saying that people should lay off Andrew Mountbatten of Windsor because he’s suffered enough!WTF has this to do with Farage?
He’s wrong about the Couzens case too. The **** was nicknamed because of his creepiness and his colleagues knew he was a wrongun, they should have turfed him out well before he had the chance to do what he did.Looking online I can only find two instances of serving police officers committing murder in the UK, so I don't understand how Farage's comments on the Couzens case are relevant to whether two-tier policing exists. One concerns an individual crime; the other is a claim about policing as a system.
Farage will do and say whatever he can to be popular, his Brexit message was all over the place, at one point saying we could be the same as Norway, without realising Norway has freedom of movement that was his biggest EU gripe.
You have exactly no idea who you are talking too. I don't use twitter or blue sky, and i happen to come on here because I like chatting to, and hearing from, people with views different to mine. Makes life more interesting. You are something different. A complete bore who makes any thread you interact with all about you and keep taking it off topic. You bored the tits off everyone on the brexit thread, and you're doing the same here.No I won’t. I’m entitled to share my views, there’s lots of people agreeing with you that aren’t posting about Farage too. Why don’t you tell them to fuck off?
You’re that insecure you can’t stand someone not agreeing with you. Your blue sky and Twitter algorithms endlessly showing you stuff you like haven’t helped you.
The pattern of behaviour in Nowak’s case
What pattern of behaviour?
Name the exact behaviour that proves this was racism and not simply a police officer believing the majority, not seeing any clear evidence of a stabbing, and hence believing the story they were expecting to find based on the 999 call.
Point out one single thing that shows Nowak’s race was the reason he wasn’t believed.
reverse racism has happened by the police and authorities.
PROVE IT.
Or give a single statistic or fact that points to it.
Because when people claimed racism towards minorities they had heaps of data to back it up, because it was real. The didn’t rely on anecdotes from right wing fascist looking to stir up discontent like Nige.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
No, it’s because you are the most guilty for derailing this threadWhy have you asked me that when several other posters who I’m in conversation with me are discussing the same topic?
Is it because you agree with them?
Oh yeah sorry, calling Farage a racist **** over and over again without actually dissecting anything he says and all thinking the same way is riveting stuff, isn’t it.You have exactly no idea who you are talking too. I don't use twitter or blue sky, and i happen to come on here because I like chatting to, and hearing from, people with views different to mine. Makes life more interesting. You are something different. A complete bore who makes any thread you interact with all about you and keep taking it off topic. You bored the tits off everyone on the brexit thread, and you're doing the same here.
Having a disagreement and talking about different topics associated to recent events is really boring. Silly me.
Just put me on ignore mate, it’ll calm you down.
And no, you can’t stand differing opinions.
The Alex Jay inquiry in 2014 literally stated on a significant number of occasions victims weren’t believed, ignored, failed because of the races of the perpetrators and the victims.PROVE IT.
Or give a single statistic or fact that points to it.
Because when people claimed racism towards minorities they had heaps of data to back it up, because it was real. The didn’t rely on anecdotes from right wing fascist looking to stir up discontent like Nige.
The 2025 review by Louise Casey concluded that authorities had often “shied away” from discussing offender ethnicity and that fears of appearing racist contributed to failures in data collection and investigation. It found evidence of over-representation of Asian/Pakistani suspects in some local datasets while also noting that national ethnicity data was often incomplete.
Victims have argued that predominantly white working-class girls were dismissed as unreliable, troublesome, or responsible for their own exploitation. Official reports repeatedly found victim-blaming attitudes and class prejudice.
This is all official literature from the reviews taken.
Now what do you say?
The Alex Jay inquiry in 2014 literally stated on a significant number of occasions victims weren’t believed, ignored, failed because of the races of the perpetrators and the victims.
The 2025 review by Louise Casey concluded that authorities had often “shied away” from discussing offender ethnicity and that fears of appearing racist contributed to failures in data collection and investigation. It found evidence of over-representation of Asian/Pakistani suspects in some local datasets while also noting that national ethnicity data was often incomplete.
Victims have argued that predominantly white working-class girls were dismissed as unreliable, troublesome, or responsible for their own exploitation. Official reports repeatedly found victim-blaming attitudes and class prejudice.
This is all official literature from the reviews taken.
Now what do you say?
Sorry, we've crossed wires here. I'm asking you to prove/show any evidence that "reverse racism" from new police training manuals is the reason Henry Nowak wasn't believed. WHich is what you, Farage and Robinson have claimed.
The CSE thing is a different thread of the conversation - I can happily accept fear of being seen as racist influenced that, my issue with you there was that you think people didn't cover up CSE by white people too.
Yeah because all the people discussing BLM and the Henry Nowak case earlier today when I wasn’t online weren’t and you were directly quoting them too lol.No, it’s because you are the most guilty for derailing this thread
the question surely is why wasn't henry believed, the officers as far i'm concerned should trust no one until actual facts are established, by all means take what has been said on board but that's different to just believing the first one to speakWhat pattern of behaviour?
Name the exact behaviour that proves this was racism and not simply a police officer believing the majority, not seeing any clear evidence of a stabbing, and hence believing the story they were expecting to find based on the 999 call.
Point out one single thing that shows Nowak’s race was the reason he wasn’t believed.
terrible policing