No action against Lukaku

The only line on the Sky Sports story says the panel “couldn’t agree an offence took place”.

I’d like to see their statement as surely they have to issue one?
 
Having actually seen the video now i'm pretty shocked he's gotten away with that. The injustice is infuriating but i'm also not bothered about him not being banned as i think United would benefit if Mourinho had the guts to drop him. Similar thing happened last season with Rooney who didn't lose his place his place until he got a ban.
 
tumblr_ozzjayljoA1tf8a5ao1_400.gif

Pisses me off looking at that. He resembles the game buckaroo, body parts flying everywhere. The fa is bent, three big games for united coming up and they don’t ban him.
 
I they want to be transparent which the government has told them they must be then they need to release the panel list and what reason they have for voting the way they did. Like someone said this is as nailed on violent conduct so how can an ex referee see otherwise is beyond corrupt.
 
Having actually seen the video now i'm pretty shocked he's gotten away with that. The injustice is infuriating but i'm also not bothered about him not being banned as i think United would benefit if Mourinho had the guts to drop him. Similar thing happened last season with Rooney who didn't lose his place his place until he got a ban.

Totally agree with this, with Lukaku available and Ibrahimovic taking what he wants it will cause hassle. Silver linings and all that.
 
The only line on the Sky Sports story says the panel “couldn’t agree an offence took place”.

I’d like to see their statement as surely they have to issue one?

I could write it.

"When put to the panel of three former referees, the panel were not unanimous that this was a case of violent conduct. In view of this, no further action will be taken."

There!
 
Totally agree with this, with Lukaku available and Ibrahimovic taking what he wants it will cause hassle. Silver linings and all that.

yes I kind of see the point but when the system is this broke then things have to change
 
I they want to be transparent which the government has told them they must be then they need to release the panel list and what reason they have for voting the way they did. Like someone said this is as nailed on violent conduct so how can an ex referee see otherwise is beyond corrupt.

Good grief, no.
There would be balaclava boys round their houses at every decision.

At most, a list from whom it was drawn released annually.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.