No Smoke Without Fire?

Sugarloaf said:
Correct, we went to Blackpool and scored an offside goal and they had a good goal disallowed. We left with the 3 points that day because of two bad decisions that went our way. Did any of you nesbits come on here saying that we bought the ref? It makes me cringe when I read some of the stuff on here.

Someone made a good point about the Drogba offside goal that gave Chelsea the title, or the Bowyer handball at Brum, or the silly sending off of Donatello against spudz. I'm sure there's been plenty more decisions go against the rags this season, but I'm not the sort of oddball who is going to spend anytime worrying about it. You play the team infront of you, you win by scoring more goals than them. They stuck 3 past Blackpool in 15 mins. Stop whining like spoilt little girls and get on with it.

END OF THREAD
I'd just like to correct you on one thing, their (Blackpool's) offside goal WAS offside. Their player (standing in an offside position) drew Lescott across to cover him leaving there second player (who was onside) to put the ball in the back of the net. The rule is you are only not offside if you are not affecting play. Their offside guy clearly was affecting play as he drew Lescott out of position, hence the goal was ruled out, correctly.
 
We are bottom of the disciplinary league with the most red and yellow cards this season and you think there is no anti City bias, even with Zabs rescinded red we're bottom. The stats are out there, just needs someone with power to stand up and be counted.
 
Last season you were 2nd in the FPL, United were 3rd. Sunderland were bottom.

Perhaps you could ask Sunderland fans what they did to revela this corruption.
 
Why would Sunderland worry about a bias towards them, they consistently finish at or near the bottom half of the disciplinary league, You think City are rightfully at the bottom, well I don't agree with you.
 
I wouldn't expect you to but if I were a Sunderland fan I'd be questionning the constand low position in the FPL. Out of interest, who do you think should be near the bottom, and where would you place city?
 
Shooter 83 said:
Fergie Bullies Ref's, simple as.
Correct - it´s intimidation by presence or potential reprisals - end of . Stalin has so much power these days that refs dare not cross him. Heard the new scum song "we´ll do what we want" . Even they know it. Absolute power corrupts not money
 
de niro said:
Too many too often for too long to be anything but corrupt.

If it looks like a duck, waddles like a duck, quacks like a duck common folks will say its a duck.

Corruption can be in many forms
Cronyism, nepotism, depotism etc.
Keep it coming mates eventually we will unearth a lot of stuff in this thread.

Let me start by Phone Hacking (with the ubiguity of bluetooth in current cell phones which 'inadvertently' lends itself downloading of spyware).

Ask why a lot of celebrities like Tiger Wood, John Terry et al are 'outed'. Are their voicemails & text messages being hacked?

Why the pair of tweedledums (Gray & Key) are 'sacrificed'? To bury the NOTW phone hacking scandal or news in the media?

Now suppose you are a referee, or have influence to mould public opinion, and if someone is privy to damaging information on you will that person or organization bend you to their agenda? Leading to further compromising you?

To start with mates I suggest you read 'The Fix' by Declan Hill.
We are deluded if we don't believe we are being fed with & by ManUre.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.