Your the Victor with that one.Taken a pretty Cavalier attitude to the funding, though.
Your the Victor with that one.Taken a pretty Cavalier attitude to the funding, though.
You RascalTaken a pretty Cavalier attitude to the funding, though.
It was smaller than a stand built by Stockport County and looked like something you’d see a mid Championship club build.
The old stand was awful and Sunderland did us a favour smashing it up. the New PL stand had a bit going for it, but not much.
Thought that was Leeds. Perhaps both. Either way I loved the old stand. My first games back in 77 were there.
The old Platt Lane held around 9,000 but was unsafe, which is why it was demolished before the Kippax in spite of the all-seater requirement.The look and design was pathetic, not fit for purpose but summed up the standard and status of the club at that time.
Same here some great memories of the old platt lane, Charlton 5-1 probably the bestI was a ST holder in the 'new' Platt Lane and really liked the stand...
Slightly hazy recollection but I think the corner of the PL stand where it met the main stand was closed first for safety reasons even when the rest of the PL was still open.The old Platt Lane held around 9,000 but was unsafe, which is why it was demolished before the Kippax in spite of the all-seater requirement.
Around about 60,000/61,000When the North Stand is complete, what will the new Total Capacity be, and will it be slightly higher than Anfield, Spurs and Arsenal or about the same?
Cost I think, although not 100% sure, we didn’t have a pot to piss in thenWas there any reason why, when the new Kippax was built, it wasn’t joined up with the Platt Lane and North Stand ends in the corners? In a similar way to how the Main Stand corners were filled in?