North Stand Construction Discussion
- Thread starter awest
- Start date
HelloCity
Well-Known Member
HelloCity
Well-Known Member
Bournemouth Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Mar 2015
- Messages
- 2,191
That puts things in perspective! Thanks for sharing!
Nice. Did you go over to have a look at the mock-up panel for yourself?
HelloCity
Well-Known Member
Huge gaping hole area where the tower foundations are covering a decent sized area. Pictures don’t show it but that concrete foundation is 6ft+ high.
HelloCity
Well-Known Member
No. Walked round the opposite side.
failsworthblueboy
Well-Known Member
Nice pics mate, thank you
Going back to the discussion about relocating the away fans from SSL3 and filling the SSL3 safe standing section with City fans.
Brentford.
Wasted tier.
Inter Milan.
Safe standing seats on SSL3 sold to City fans. Apparently it filled up later on into the game. Not my picture. Taken from another thread.
City fans standing at the back. Left corner next to the away end.
Regarding Brentford’s support. Brentford fans on SSL2 and SSL3 could have probably fitted in to blocks 110 and 111, meaning both SSL2 and SSL3 could have been full of City fans. 1000+ safe standing City fans on SSL3, and City could have made more money from City fans on SSL2.
Brentford.
Wasted tier.
Inter Milan.
Safe standing seats on SSL3 sold to City fans. Apparently it filled up later on into the game. Not my picture. Taken from another thread.
City fans standing at the back. Left corner next to the away end.
Regarding Brentford’s support. Brentford fans on SSL2 and SSL3 could have probably fitted in to blocks 110 and 111, meaning both SSL2 and SSL3 could have been full of City fans. 1000+ safe standing City fans on SSL3, and City could have made more money from City fans on SSL2.
Last edited: