The idea is to keep the away fans near the coach park so GMP can get them in and out fast. And so they can walk back into town and to the train stations without having to go around the ground.
Last edited:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
North Stand Construction Discussion
- Thread starter awest
- Start date
The idea is to keep the away fans near the coach park so GMP can get them in and out fast. And so they can walk back into town and to the train stations without having to go around the ground.
JGL07
Well-Known Member
Bouncing cheque?Post dated cheque
Or bouncing Czech if Robert Maxwell was involved?
blueyorkie
Well-Known Member
It’s not worked at the south stand, why would we give up the advantage of having our own end?I thought the idea was to keep the away fans near the singing section to play off each other?
MCFC Wirral
Well-Known Member
Having the away fans near the singing section is important for chants, banter etc.
To move like minded fans en masse to a new section is going to be very difficult.
To move like minded fans en masse to a new section is going to be very difficult.
Having the away fans near the singing section is important for chants, banter etc.
To move like minded fans en masse to a new section is going to be very difficult.
No it’s not, I’m moving. ;-)
So are the 1894 lads.
Well considering all everyone does is moan how bad the atmosphere is then it can’t have that much effect. I for one will move from 115 straight away.Having the away fans near the singing section is important for chants, banter etc.
To move like minded fans en masse to a new section is going to be very difficult.
Symmetry is generally good is my point but I alsoI like that the plans have added hotel and other facilities and made the stadium different my initial post was before the plans and in response to someone not liking the external of the other stand and hoping this stand was different in terms of external rather than symmetry this is my main point I cannot see it being completely different here other wise it will look oddSymmetrical bowl stadiums are so early 2000s and make most stadiums look near identical. I love the idea of one stand being a focal point like they have in a number of NFL and MLB stadiums. It gives a bit more of a unique feel.
Symmetry is generally good is my point but I alsoI like that the plans have added hotel and other facilities and made the stadium different my initial post was before the plans and in response to someone not liking the external of the other stand and hoping this stand was different in terms of external rather than symmetry this is my main point I cannot see it being completely different here other wise it will look odd
That some one wasn’t me. I told you I didn’t say that. I told you the North stand exterior wouldn’t be the same as the South stand exterior. You said it would be. Let it go and just be happy almost everyone is happy with the proposal.
Cheadle_hulmeBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 16,961
Symmetrical bowl stadiums are so early 2000s and make most stadiums look near identical. I love the idea of one stand being a focal point like they have in a number of NFL and MLB stadiums. It gives a bit more of a unique feel.
100% agree. Why would we want to join the tiers up. It would end up looking like arsenals ground.
A home end needs a proper identity and to stand out. Not be a continuation of what we already have
Cheadle_hulmeBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 16,961
I was wondering if moving the away fans and their coach park to the NS would be the plan. Is there enough room to satisfy requirements if they're in tier 1 and perhaps up the corners if needed. At least it would keep them below City fans.
We finally get a home end and let’s fill it with away fans? Why on earth would we do that?