Blue Mooner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Jun 2005
- Messages
- 3,139
Neil McNab said:The 6 minutes 45 seconds was fair, the subs and a bit of rolling around we did justified that, we'd want it if the boot was on the other foot, looks very silly and predictable to moan about it to be honest!Davs 19 said:blueinsa said:Possibly he gave 5 and 5 he should have played.
They make it up as they go along and that fooker today was a disgrace!
Share the frustration but it is 5 initial minutes. I thought the guy was inept today but thought he had the added time pretty much right.
Absolutely we would, but never do. Reading had two players go down for significant amounts of time, did the same time wasting on substitutions yet we only got 4 minutes of injury time at home - fortunately that was all we needed.
Not only that how can a ref find only 4 minutes of injury time in 45 minutes against Reading but when we play Norwich he finds another 2 minutes in 5 minutes of injury time ? It doesn't make any sense other than blatant bias.