Not Keen on Mancini

seantheduck said:
Had a sleep on it before jumping on here!

15 managers in 20 years and just as we are making progress CITY do it again! - Hughes was a transition manager - 'evolution not revolution' is what Owners said.

I predict we will now finish mid table, no CC final and a new manager will be brought in next summer when Mancini has finished counting his money...He was a great player but better than Hughes as Manager?

1. Mancini does not even speak english - if so good why no work for 12 months?
2. Players will be spit, Bellers, RSC and others will want away - dressing room will. be fun!
3. Mancini won fuck all outside Italy (corrupt weak league anyway so means nothing)
4. He knows fuck all about football in prem league and english footy.
5. All the backroom and suport staff changes, no stability.

I am not a Hughes fan and said he had a full season with his players, 2 defeats, 1 point off top 6 with game in hand, semi final I was happy as could see progress on last year - Total Fucking Madness and other supporters taking piss big time and who can blame them....

If we lose next 3 games will we change manager again?

To be honest I think the club and team is being run by Cook and others - does not really matter who is manager now as they have no real power over things....

STOKE - WOLVES - BLACKBURN - EVERTON - If we are not in top 4-6 after these games will Man

EDIT : Changed attention whore title
Couldn't give too sh*ts about Bellars and RSC et al if they don't like they know where the door is. The Elano affair showed no player is bigger than the club. I like Mancini and anyone else who the owners chose to manager our great club. FFS get behind him and lets take this club forward and stop living in the past CTID
 
Cheesy said:
loffers said:
All this drama for Mancini, I could understand it for Jose or Gus but this charlie? nah , bad karma coming our way , I can see all hte Hughes outers all pretending to rate him whist deep down they dont want what they all wished for

I'm not pretending anything. I thought Hughes was a pretty useless manager and any number of others could have done a better job. Mancini hopefully (and will, I think) will prove to be one of these.

Same for me fella.
 
deano ou812 said:
Cheesy said:
I'm not pretending anything. I thought Hughes was a pretty useless manager and any number of others could have done a better job. Mancini hopefully (and will, I think) will prove to be one of these.
only time will tell but will he be given the time?

I hope so. I think Hughes was given enough time bearing in mind he wasn't an ADUG appointment in the first place.
 
Cheesy said:
deano ou812 said:
only time will tell but will he be given the time?

I hope so. I think Hughes was given enough time bearing in mind he wasn't an ADUG appointment in the first place.

Well Sunderland didn't think he was better than Bruce , does that make you feel more excited or less excited?
 
Bluebeer said:
CooperMcfcF/W said:
One thing Mancini has that Hughes does not have as a manager...................Trophies.

You dont win 3 league titles on the bounce if you are a crap manager.
Some blues need to learn about football.


Mancini inherited a top 2 team and won the first league by default when juve were striped of the title and relegated in the match fixing scandle. the next two season were made a little easier with out juve. (as someone wrote, imagine chelsea's struggle if the rags got relegated)

before then he won the cup with Forentina, who were also one of the most corrupt teams/owners, reported to be involved in match fixing (allegedly)....and he won the cup with them....


hes won trophies, but it looks better on paper than it actually is.

No. He did not inherit a top 2 team. He inherited a team that had finished 11th in the league and a club that had not won the title in nearly 20 years.
He also won the cup with Lazio but I suppose that was down to corruption aswel? Fuck it, by the sounds of it, going off some of the idiots on here, the whole match fixing thing was all done so that Mancini could win some trophies!
 
ElanJo said:
Bluebeer said:
Mancini inherited a top 2 team and won the first league by default when juve were striped of the title and relegated in the match fixing scandle. the next two season were made a little easier with out juve. (as someone wrote, imagine chelsea's struggle if the rags got relegated)

before then he won the cup with Forentina, who were also one of the most corrupt teams/owners, reported to be involved in match fixing (allegedly)....and he won the cup with them....


hes won trophies, but it looks better on paper than it actually is.

Some people cannot move on its a shame i thought everyone would unite.

No. He did not inherit a top 2 team. He inherited a team that had finished 11th in the league and a club that had not won the title in nearly 20 years. Yes, Juve got stripped of the title but they were involved in match fixing so it's probably safe to say that Inter would have won the title had they not.
He also won the cup with Lazio but I suppose that was down to corruption aswel? Fuck it, by the sounds of it, going off some of the idiots on here, the whole match fixing thing was all done so that Mancini could win some trophies!
 
wrongun73 said:
Adam Donnelly said:
Why is everyone bangin on about Prem experience???

Mourinho, Ancelotti, Benitez
They have been ok in the Prem

Maybe we should have gone for Fat Sam, he has loads of Prem experience
good point well made lad :)
That got me thinking when was the last time someone won the title having had any experience playing or managing in England(prior to that job)Kenny Dalglish at Blackburn??
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.