Official - City end interest in Eto'o [merged]

Re: Samuel Eto'o [merged]

its seems to be swinging back in our favour but how many times is that gonna change in the next couple of hours? as ajay said anythink this morning? i remeber ajay saying yesterday that city wanted the contract signed last night does this mean we are gonna pull out ajay or do you think there were talks last night that will today really any news?
 
Re: Samuel Eto'o [merged]

looks like we'll see RSC unveiled tomorrow, promptly followed by 30 mins of question dodging from MH.
 
Re: Samuel Eto'o [merged]

svennis pennis said:
tommcfc said:
Sam Eto's work visa said:
WTF

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/manchester_city/s/1123489_etoo_eyes_barca_stay" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... barca_stay</a>

its just the same as all the other reports this morning.

Put a negative spin on it. Has to be the rag that now writes our reports.
Looks like a Press Association wire story.
 
Re: Samuel Eto'o [merged]

svennis pennis said:
tommcfc said:
Sam Eto's work visa said:
WTF

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/manchester_city/s/1123489_etoo_eyes_barca_stay" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... barca_stay</a>

its just the same as all the other reports this morning.

Put a negative spin on it. Has to be the rag that now writes our reports.

Actually, whenever Stuart Brennan writes a report about us, he has his name at the top, usually the really bias ones don't have a name on them, whether that's strategic planning by Mr.B or not is another question.
 
Re: Samuel Eto'o [merged]

mcfcinprague said:
Like I said this morning - I think the bit that is pissing us all off is the silence from the club - If we haven't made a bid, then surely they would say so - If we have and it's been rejected by Barca or Eto'o in the first instance, then surely they would say so - which can only mean we have made a bid and it's been accepted by both parties.

But either there are no issues at all or if there are, then we must feel they are not too big to get them out of the way. And if they are too big then surely we would say so - unless this is anaother Kaka fiasco in the making and we will be made to look mugs again.

But let's understand one thing Cook and co know what the whole world is saying, so surely it's getting a little late in the day now to say we've cocked up again - I think that this deal is still very doable, because if it goes wrong I can see Cook getting his balls chopped off as well as his hands.

The silence at City whilst other clubs and the players play their silly games is admirable and shows the professional attitude that will, in the long term, lead this club to the place where we all want to be.

It is interesting that Sky Sports News have suddenly gone very quiet on the matter, and my opinion (and i'm not ITK, but a business man) is that City are calling the shots with the press and giving them very little, and telling them when to go quiet to assist us in return for the news when it happens. This is building up a mutual trust and respect...except for The Mirror which is still constantly clutching at straws and therefore receiving no truth from the club.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.