Offside rule changed after Silva's goal against Villa

2nd goal will probably result in another rule change ;-)
FFP didn't work. Banning City from Europe didn't work.

Ignoring City and pretending this is the first time season they're top of the league. Didn't work.

Change the off side rules and immediately City score a goal so the liner flags off side. Doesn't work.

Whats next to try and stop City?
 
This is so shit, another rule that favours defence. So if the player is caught offside, he is out of the game until when, a defender can linger on the ball for 5, 10 seconds and what then, the offside player cannot challenge.

that is a great point and will be used to slow the game down by other teams
 
FFP didn't work. Banning City from Europe didn't work.

Ignoring City and pretending this is the first time season they're top of the league. Didn't work.

Change the off side rules and immediately City score a goal so the liner flags off side. Doesn't work.

Whats next to try and stop City?
You can bet they’ll be something else along very soon
 
Absolute howler from Sian Massey tonight. Flag should stay down.
After van Dijk got injured, the football world was crying about how the linesman’s flag should go up earlier.

After last week’s far too over the top furore about our goal against Villa, the officials were probably on edge tonight about offsides and City. It’s Dean Smith’s fault more than it is Sian Massey’s.

Also, you tell Under 8s in their first ever football training session “play to the whistle, always play to the whistle, no matter what”!
 
FFP didn't work. Banning City from Europe didn't work.

Ignoring City and pretending this is the first time season they're top of the league. Didn't work.

Change the off side rules and immediately City score a goal so the liner flags off side. Doesn't work.

Whats next to try and stop City?
I’ve heard in the grapevine that the Premier League are installing mounted machine guns at the entrance to the Etihad in an attempt to stop us.
 
that is a great point and will be used to slow the game down by other teams

It won’t, it’s only applicable immediately after the defender deliberately plays the ball, so, in the case of Mings, whilst they’re still bringing it fully in control.
 
Ridiculous rule in the first place, but at least it was the same for everyone.
Changing the rules halfway through a season is even more ridiculous.
Will they change the rules again after another controversial one tonight?
 
Absolute howler from Sian Massey tonight. Flag

Absolute howler from Sian Massey tonight. Flag should stay down.
Liners are apparently told to keep flags down, so not sure why Sian raised flag, more so that there wasnt an offside at the time. Hope it doesnt result in her being targetted or punished when many refs get away with far worse "errors".
 
Ridiculous rule in the first place, but at least it was the same for everyone.
Changing the rules halfway through a season is even more ridiculous.
Will they change the rules again after another controversial one tonight?

They haven’t changed the rule. They’ve added additional clarification as it wasn’t the same for everyone.

Bear in mind it’s IFAB who have issued the clarification, not pgmol.
 
FFP didn't work. Banning City from Europe didn't work.

Ignoring City and pretending this is the first time season they're top of the league. Didn't work.

Change the off side rules and immediately City score a goal so the liner flags off side. Doesn't work.

Whats next to try and stop City?
The season will be abandoned for Covid if we’re winning in May.
 
I disagree. She waited until Berny turned back, at that point the attack had stopped and she could flag as per the rules as there wasnt an imminent chance of City scoring. The ref should have blown for the offside. He didnt and we scored and the piss boiling started.
I fully accept berny was onside and she was wrong in that respect though.
Rubbish. If the attack stopped how did we score?
 
I disagree. She waited until Berny turned back, at that point the attack had stopped and she could flag as per the rules as there wasnt an imminent chance of City scoring. The ref should have blown for the offside. He didnt and we scored and the piss boiling started.
I fully accept berny was onside and she was wrong in that respect though.
How do you know the attack had stopped did Bernado tell you?
 
Rubbish. If the attack stopped how did we score?
When he received the ball he was running towards the goal so she did not flag thereby allowing VAR to make the decision if Berny scored but he ended up near the dead ball line and started to go back. At that point Bernies attack had ended so she flagged, the ref ignored her, Bernie passed it back and the rest is history.
OK it looks simple Bernie passed it, Cancelo scored but what if instead of shooting he passed to Sterling who passed to etc etc who then shoots and we score. How far back does Var go.
Anyway, did you see the look she gave the Ref :-) I get them off Mrs Mist all the time/
 
When he received the ball he was running towards the goal so she did not flag thereby allowing VAR to make the decision if Berny scored but he ended up near the dead ball line and started to go back. At that point Bernies attack had ended so she flagged, the ref ignored her, Bernie passed it back and the rest is history.
OK it looks simple Bernie passed it, Cancelo scored but what if instead of shooting he passed to Sterling who passed to etc etc who then shoots and we score. How far back does Var go.
Anyway, did you see the look she gave the Ref :-) I get them off Mrs Mist all the time/
If Bernardo turning away from goal is end of attack then the flag should never stay down.
It doesn’t necessarily follow that you have to be facing goal to attack/shoot/score.
He could have cut back and crossed it and it be headed in but on your logic the game has to be stopped when he cuts back to make the cross.
I’m fairly certain the referees are not told to do as you suggest either.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top