Olivia’s killer guilty - Minimum of 42 years

MCFC Wirral said:
Very brave people to take the stand against him. They hate grasses in Merseyside so I hope they’re protected afterwards.

I read he showed no emotion or remorse throughout which is the mark of a sociopath. I hope he rots in hell.
Click to expand...
Ex has gone into witness protection according to sky
 
Worsleyweb said:
I am confused he was in court with his long term Mrs?
Click to expand...

Another lady he went to immediately afterwards he must have been in extra relations with heard him confess. It was that part that gave the police the evidence to get him to court and convicted, very brave of her as I imagine she and all her family will have new identities and looking over their shoulders for the rest of their lives from the defendants scum family and friends.
 
halfmist said:
His family just sum up the worst of Society.
If any of them felt the slightest remorse for the poor young girl who had a tragic end to her life they would have shouted the same as the rest of us,had we been in Court.. Hang The Bastard.
Click to expand...
They'll get theirs one day.
 
paulchapo said:
She fits every stereotype of a girlfriend living off the proceeds of a lowlife criminal. Scum, as are his family. Edited to add I've just seen her name....wait for it.......Kayleeanne Sweeney..You couldn't make it up, though obviously her parent/s did. Raised on reality TV shows, lip filler and her hair and nails done every week, while claiming benefits and dreaming of being the next love island contestant. That didn't work so she nabbed herself a £20,000 a month drug dealer. Gotta love a bad boy innit?
Click to expand...
I saw this bunch arriving when on my way to work in Spinningfields, pure dingles
 
Sir peace frog said:
they should look into his house , cars and anything else, if they can prove the only way he could pay for them was by selling drugs they should confiscate everything sell it and the proceeds go towards the little girls parents
Click to expand...

Him and his girlfriend's were living in a very expensive property. Not sure if it was bought or rented.
 
Johnny Mars Bar said:
I haven't seen the photos but I can picture what scouse, murdering drug-dealing scum look like...

Let me guess - the women head to toe in snide Gucci, the men in snide black North Face?
Click to expand...
Not far off...

TELEMMGLPICT000330648238_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqI_nWroZV2Kj5BLP-0LLaCPEeTFgPXoiyxxl0vFVRUd4.jpeg


1_271571225.jpg
 
paulchapo said:
Him and his girlfriend's were living in a very expensive property. Not sure if it was bought or rented.
Click to expand...

Rented. He doesn’t sound like the type who is going to have much, if any, investment worth going after for proceeds of crime.

Some of the media were trying to portray him as some kind of Mr. Big. But Mr. Big’s don’t run around streets waving guns around and getting themselves banged up for 40 years. They have idiots like this to do that.
 
Stephen230 said:
Rented. He doesn’t sound like the type who is going to have much, if any, investment worth going after for proceeds of crime.

Some of the media were trying to portray him as some kind of Mr. Big. But Mr. Big’s don’t run around streets waving guns around and getting themselves banged up for 40 years. They have idiots like this to do that.
Click to expand...

Supposedly earning £5,000 a week. It's a stupid way of life as it ends in prison or death and you're always looking over your shoulder.
 
shackattack said:
Good article in the guardian on the case

www.theguardian.com

Olivia Pratt-Korbel case pitted defiant star witness against killer’s cleverness

Thomas Cashman’s former lover left his lawyer flustered and told the court: ‘We’re here for justice’
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...
This part did confuse me somewhat, given the location of the trial:
Cashman’s prompt conviction – he will be sentenced at a later date – could be a sign that tolerance for organised crime in Merseyside is running low
Click to expand...
I have to say, reading that article, she must have been a seriously compelling witness for the jury to be sure. Certainly seems doubt was at least raised by Cashman. She must have been a wholly plausible wintness. Only rational explanation.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
This part did confuse me somewhat, given the location of the trial:

I have to say, reading that article, she must have been a seriously compelling witness for the jury to be sure. Certainly seems doubt was at least raised by Cashman. She must have been a wholly plausible wintness. Only rational explanation.
Click to expand...

I didn’t follow the trial at all closely so wouldn’t even begin to offer an opinion on the verdict.

But it’s a strange article. Apart from that woman’s evidence it almost entirely seems to concentrate on putting doubts in the reader’s mind of the validity of the conviction.

No mention whatsoever of the evidence of the guy who had already pleaded guilty to being his accomplice. Even though the press weren’t privy to his actual evidence, you’d imagine it would have to be pretty compelling evidence and worthy of mention in a summary of the trial.
 
Stephen230 said:
I didn’t follow the trial at all closely so wouldn’t even begin to offer an opinion on the verdict.

But it’s a strange article. Apart from that woman’s evidence it almost entirely seems to concentrate on putting doubts in the reader’s mind of the validity of the conviction.

No mention whatsoever of the evidence of the guy who had already pleaded guilty to being his accomplice. Even though the press weren’t privy to his actual evidence, you’d imagine it would have to be pretty compelling evidence and worthy of mention in a summary of the trial.
Click to expand...
None of us can begin to understand the dynamics in that room.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top