They’ve certainly not answered my letters demanding they apologise…Has Erling Haaland and his dad apologised for this yet?
If not I'm burning my shirt with his name on the back and no celebrating any of his goals.
Thought that was a rag pub back in the day ?Before I get angry, can I just confirm that the ship we are on about was the Pomona Palace ?
They have gone through a period of self flagellation themselves in terms of benefiting from slavery and have pulled the rest of Manchester including the reds and us into their analysis. Whilst I didn’t agree with much of their conclusions, I didn’t see the article as a hatchet job.So an image of a ship now automatically means slavery?
This article sounds like the guardian clutching at straws and trying to create a reaction.
They have gone through a period of self flagellation themselves in terms of benefiting from slavery and have pulled the rest of Manchester including the reds and us into their analysis. Whilst I didn’t agree with much of their conclusions, I didn’t see the article as a hatchet job.
Saw Thin Lizzy there ....not the hotel. To be fair the facade is still there.I thought it was The Ramada Hotel?
I thought this as well, but it turned out the ship on the Manchester coat of arms (1842) predates the canal by 50 years (opened 1894) which is pretty conclusive.
I didn’t and haven’t and aren’t.You wake up one morning and decide that a cartoon ship was once a slave ship and that we should in some way be ashamed of that?
It's bollocks from top to bottom mate ;)
I didn’t and haven’t and aren’t.
I did read the article though.