Colin could do anything two footed, head, tackle and run like I have never seen. He could play anywhere on the pitch. Best all round player ever IMO. But most all was a lovely guy.Bell
D. Silva
Rodri
Yaya
Sergio
KDB
Haaland
Our best player is among these but its difficult to choose one above the other.
All the above when playing for us at their peak would walk into any side in the world, think about that! Even those mardarses at Madrid.
You could argue Bernardo and Foden are not far short of this list either.
For me - so help me God - Tevez. Still my most favorite and simultaneously least liked player for City ever.
I have said this before a while back.
The best players from the past would still be the best players today. I am not sure the best players from today would be the best players in the past. My reasoning, the pitches. In the past you would not be as successful parking the bus as the bounce of the ball, if it bounced at all some games, was unpredictable, the players would lose their footing and make mistakes. We see it now every game, teams come, park the bus and hope for a breakaway goal. The reason, in my opinion, is the pitch allows them to be ultra tactical as the bounce of the ball is true unlike the past.
What would be Pep Guardiola's greatest City XI? Its also funny topic to discuss
I have probably two scenarios , depending on formation
Something like this is one
Ederson
Walker Stones Dias
Rodri Gundogan
Bernardo KDB Sterling
Haaland Aguero
My list based on : number of seasons/games under Pep, influence, goals/assist and trophies won during tenure
HM: Dinho, Cancelo, Silva
It is a bit of fun. I think your mistaking the 70s for the 50s though. It was well known Roy Paul definitely, maybe others, started matchday in The Claremont downing a few pints. Remember my uncle saying to me as Roy Paul paraded the FA Cup around Wembley after beating Birmingham, looking as though he was sweating profusely, he said thats not sweat on him it's the beer coming out! Ken Barnes though seemed different as I used to see him in a cafe on Wilmslow Road, opposite Claremont Road, having a brew on matchday.It’s a fun debate this, as I think the opposite.
IMO modern players would run rings around the old players, thanks to modern coaching and training etc.
Stick some player from the 70s after a breakfast of Guinness and fried eggs who’s spent his life playing on muddy quagmires on a modern zippy billiard table of a pitch against some of the best athletes in the world and he’d be absolutely fucked.
The fun thing about this is we’ll never really know.
Thank you for using "criterion" properly. So many think "criteria" is a singular noun, for some reason. The same as "phenomenon/phenomena". It's nice to see English being used properly, even if it is basically a Bit of classical Greek grammar.It's interesting how people decide that player X is better or greater than player Y.
Take Silva and Aguero and assume Silva was the greater player. What made Silva a better/greater player than Aguero? Was it that Silva was more important or fundamental to our performances, i.e., that we would have had worse results without him than without Aguero? That's hard to quantify and I doubt it, but if one uses this criterion, then you may end up with Rodri as the best ever.
If you say that Silva was more complete than Aguero and could control games, then the result is the same: Rodri is even more complete, for he holds everything together and is a beast defensively to boot.
If you go by technical ability in small spaces, then Silva is probably the best, but scoring and assisting also requires technical ability and in this respect both Aguero and KDB are a level or two above Silva. Aguero could score from ridiculous angles and situations, and goals decide games. Same with KDB regarding assists.
It's interesting how people "calculate" greatness.
I will get my thesaurusThank you for using "criterion" properly. So many think "criteria" is a singular noun, for some reason. The same as "phenomenon/phenomena". It's nice to see English being used properly, even if it is basically a Bit of classical Greek grammar.